000859328 001__ 859328
000859328 005__ 20250129092504.0
000859328 037__ $$aFZJ-2019-00197
000859328 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)172900$$aIzumoto, Satoshi$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000859328 1112_ $$aAGU Fall Meeting$$cWashington, D.C.$$d2018-12-10 - 2018-12-14$$wUSA
000859328 245__ $$aSpectral induced polarization of calcite precipitation in a porous media
000859328 260__ $$c2018
000859328 3367_ $$033$$2EndNote$$aConference Paper
000859328 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aINPROCEEDINGS
000859328 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aconferenceObject
000859328 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aCONFERENCE_POSTER
000859328 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Conference Poster
000859328 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)24$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aPoster$$bposter$$mposter$$s1547554084_15236$$xAfter Call
000859328 520__ $$aInduced calcite precipitation is used in a range of in-situ geotechnical applications to modify the mechanical and hydrological properties of soils and fractured rocks. It is also a model process for mixing-induced biogeochemical reactions that occur naturally in a broad range of hydrological systems. Laboratory experiments have shown that spectral induced polarization (SIP) measurements can be used to monitor calcite precipitation. However, the results of the limited number of previous studies investigating the SIP response of calcite precipitation were not fully consistent. This study aims to investigate how the SIP response of calcite depends on solute composition, since this may explain the differences in SIP response observed in previous studies. For this, a five-phase experiment with SIP measurements on a column filled with sand was performed. In phase I, calcite precipitation was generated for a period of 12 days by injecting Na2CO3 and CaCl2 solutions through two different ports. This resulted in a well-defined calcite precipitation front, which was associated with an increase in the imaginary conductivity in the kHz frequency range. In phase II, the injected solutions were stepwise diluted. This resulted in a clear decrease in the imaginary conductivity. In phase III, the injection of the two solutions was stopped. Nevertheless, calcite precipitation continued and solute concentrations in the mixing zone decreased. As in phase II, this led to a decrease in the imaginary conductivity. In phase IV, the injection rate of the Na2CO3 solution was reduced to shift the mixing zone away from the calcite precipitation front, which also decreased the imaginary conductivity. Finally, the column was flushed with a solution in equilibrium with calcite in phase V, which led to a very small SIP signal. These results imply that the SIP response of calcite is very sensitive to the solution composition near the precipitates, which may explain the previously reported conflicting results. In a next step, the relationship between SIP response, volume of calcite, and solute composition will be quantitatively investigated using SIP measurements on a 2D milifluidic cell with an artificial porous media that allows visualizing the temporal dynamics of calcite precipitation.
000859328 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000859328 536__ $$0G:(EU-Grant)722028$$aENIGMA - European training Network for In situ imaGing of dynaMic processes in heterogeneous subsurfAce environments (722028)$$c722028$$fH2020-MSCA-ITN-2016$$x1
000859328 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129472$$aHuisman, Johan Alexander$$b1
000859328 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)133962$$aZimmermann, Egon$$b2
000859328 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMéheust, Yves$$b3
000859328 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGomez, Francesco$$b4
000859328 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHeyman, Joris$$b5
000859328 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWu, Yuxin$$b6
000859328 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aVereecken, Harry$$b7
000859328 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLe Borgne, Tanguy$$b8
000859328 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:859328$$pec_fundedresources$$pVDB$$popenaire
000859328 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)172900$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000859328 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129472$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000859328 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)133962$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000859328 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-HGF)0$$aExternal Institute$$b3$$kExtern
000859328 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-HGF)0$$aExternal Institute$$b4$$kExtern
000859328 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-HGF)0$$aExternal Institute$$b5$$kExtern
000859328 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-HGF)0$$aExternal Institute$$b6$$kExtern
000859328 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b7$$kFZJ
000859328 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000859328 9141_ $$y2018
000859328 920__ $$lyes
000859328 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000859328 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)ZEA-2-20090406$$kZEA-2$$lZentralinstitut für Elektronik$$x1
000859328 980__ $$aposter
000859328 980__ $$aVDB
000859328 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000859328 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ZEA-2-20090406
000859328 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000859328 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)PGI-4-20110106