000859359 001__ 859359
000859359 005__ 20210130000241.0
000859359 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s00374-018-1317-2
000859359 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0178-2762
000859359 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1432-0789
000859359 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/21204
000859359 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000447917800006
000859359 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:49703067
000859359 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:30956377
000859359 037__ $$aFZJ-2019-00227
000859359 082__ $$a640
000859359 1001_ $$00000-0002-4156-1897$$ade Sosa, Laura L.$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000859359 245__ $$aStoichiometric constraints on the microbial processing of carbon with soil depth along a riparian hillslope
000859359 260__ $$aHeidelberg$$bSpringer$$c2018
000859359 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000859359 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000859359 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1547622429_9151
000859359 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000859359 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000859359 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000859359 520__ $$aSoil organic matter (SOM) content is a key indicator of riparian soil functioning and in the provision of ecosystem services such as water retention, flood alleviation, pollutant attenuation and carbon (C) sequestration for climate change mitigation. Here, we studied the importance of microbial biomass and nutrient availability in regulating SOM turnover rates. C stabilisation in soil is expected to vary both vertically, down the soil profile and laterally across the riparian zone. In this study, we evaluated the influence of five factors on C mineralisation (Cmin): (i) substrate quantity, (ii) substrate quality, (iii) nutrient (C, N and P) stoichiometry, (iv) soil microbial activity with proximity to the river (2 to 75 m) and (v) as a function of soil depth (0–3 m). Substrate quality, quantity and nutrient stoichiometry were evaluated using high and low molecular weight 14C-labelled dissolved organic (DOC) along with different nutrient additions. Differences in soil microbial activity with proximity to the river and soil depth were assessed by comparing initial (immediate) Cmin rates and cumulative C mineralised at the end of the incubation period. Overall, microbial biomass C (MBC), organic matter (OM) and soil moisture content (MC) proved to be the major factors controlling rates of Cmin at depth. Differences in the immediate and medium-term response (42 days) of Cmin suggested that microbial growth increased and carbon use efficiency (CUE) decreased down the soil profile. Inorganic N and/or P availability had little or no effect on Cmin suggesting that microbial community growth and activity is predominantly C limited. Similarly, proximity to the watercourse also had relatively little effect on Cmin. This work challenges current theories suggesting that areas adjacent to watercourse process C differently from upslope areas. In contrast, our results suggest that substrate quality and microbial biomass are more important in regulating C processing rates rather than proximity to a river.
000859359 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000859359 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000859359 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGlanville, Helen C.$$b1
000859359 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMarshall, Miles R.$$b2
000859359 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)157922$$aSchnepf, Andrea$$b3
000859359 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aCooper, David M.$$b4
000859359 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHill, Paul W.$$b5
000859359 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBinley, Andrew$$b6
000859359 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aJones, Davey L.$$b7
000859359 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1473419-9$$a10.1007/s00374-018-1317-2$$gVol. 54, no. 8, p. 949 - 963$$n8$$p949 - 963$$tBiology and fertility of soils$$v54$$x1432-0789$$y2018
000859359 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/859359/files/Sosa2018_Article_StoichiometricConstraintsOnThe.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000859359 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/859359/files/Sosa2018_Article_StoichiometricConstraintsOnThe.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000859359 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:859359$$pdnbdelivery$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000859359 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)157922$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000859359 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000859359 9141_ $$y2018
000859359 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000859359 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000859359 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000859359 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1040$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bZoological Record
000859359 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bBIOL FERT SOILS : 2017
000859359 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000859359 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000859359 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000859359 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000859359 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000859359 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000859359 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000859359 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000859359 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000859359 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000859359 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000859359 920__ $$lno
000859359 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000859359 980__ $$ajournal
000859359 980__ $$aVDB
000859359 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000859359 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000859359 9801_ $$aFullTexts