% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Gaul:859724,
author = {Gaul, Alexander and Emmrich, Daniel and Ueltzhöffer, Timo
and Huckfeldt, Henning and Doğanay, Hatice and Hackl,
Johanna and Khan, Muhammad Imtiaz and Gottlob, Daniel M and
Hartmann, Gregor and Beyer, André and Holzinger, Dennis and
Nemšák, Slavomír and Schneider, Claus M and Gölzhäuser,
Armin and Reiss, Günter and Ehresmann, Arno},
title = {{S}ize limits of magnetic-domain engineering in continuous
in-plane exchange-bias prototype films},
journal = {Beilstein journal of nanotechnology},
volume = {9},
issn = {2190-4286},
address = {Frankfurt, M.},
publisher = {Beilstein-Institut zur Förderung der Chemischen
Wissenschaften},
reportid = {FZJ-2019-00561},
pages = {2968 - 2979},
year = {2018},
abstract = {Background: The application of superparamagnetic particles
as biomolecular transporters in microfluidic systems for
lab-on-a-chip applications crucially depends on the ability
to control their motion. One approach for magnetic-particle
motion control is the superposition of static magnetic stray
field landscapes (MFLs) with dynamically varying external
fields. These MFLs may emerge from magnetic domains
engineered both in shape and in their local anisotropies.
Motion control of smaller beads does necessarily need
smaller magnetic patterns, i.e., MFLs varying on smaller
lateral scales. The achievable size limit of engineered
magnetic domains depends on the magnetic patterning method
and on the magnetic anisotropies of the material system.
Smallest patterns are expected to be in the range of the
domain wall width of the particular material system. To
explore these limits a patterning technology is needed with
a spatial resolution significantly smaller than the domain
wall width.Results: We demonstrate the application of a
helium ion microscope with a beam diameter of 8 nm as a
mask-less method for local domain patterning of magnetic
thin-film systems. For a prototypical in-plane exchange-bias
system the domain wall width has been investigated as a
function of the angle between unidirectional anisotropy and
domain wall. By shrinking the domain size of periodic domain
stripes, we analyzed the influence of domain wall overlap on
the domain stability. Finally, by changing the geometry of
artificial two-dimensional domains, the influence of domain
wall overlap and domain wall geometry on the ultimate domain
size in the chosen system was analyzed.Conclusion: The
application of a helium ion microscope for magnetic
patterning has been shown. It allowed for exploring the
fundamental limits of domain engineering in an in-plane
exchange-bias thin film as a prototypical system. For
two-dimensional domains the limit depends on the domain
geometry. The relative orientation between domain wall and
anisotropy axes is a crucial parameter and therefore
influences the achievable minimum domain size dramatically.},
cin = {PGI-6},
ddc = {620},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)PGI-6-20110106},
pnm = {522 - Controlling Spin-Based Phenomena (POF3-522)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-522},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:30591845},
UT = {WOS:000451826800001},
doi = {10.3762/bjnano.9.276},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/859724},
}