% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{WeissLucas:860098,
      author       = {Weiss Lucas, Carolin and Kallioniemi, Elisa and
                      Neuschmelting, Volker and Nettekoven, Charlotte and
                      Pieczewski, Julia and Jonas, Kristina and Goldbrunner,
                      Roland and Karhu, Jari and Grefkes, Christian and Julkunen,
                      Petro},
      title        = {{C}ortical {I}nhibition of {F}ace and {J}aw {M}uscle
                      {A}ctivity and {D}iscomfort {I}nduced by {R}epetitive and
                      {P}aired-{P}ulse {TMS} {D}uring an {O}vert {O}bject {N}aming
                      {T}ask},
      journal      = {Brain topography},
      volume       = {32},
      number       = {3},
      issn         = {1573-6792},
      address      = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2019-00884},
      pages        = {418-434},
      year         = {2019},
      abstract     = {Modulatory effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation
                      (TMS) strongly depend on the stimulation parameters. Here,
                      we compared the immediate, task-locked inhibitory effects on
                      speech-related muscles and the tolerability of different TMS
                      protocols during a language production task. Repetitive TMS
                      (rTMS) and paired-pulse TMS (PP) were applied in 13 healthy
                      subjects over the primary motor cortex (M1) during a
                      finger-tapping/tongue-twisting tasks. The lowest
                      subject-specific TMS intensity leading to movement
                      disruptions was used for TMS over left-sided speech-related
                      areas during picture naming. Here, time-locked PP and rTMS
                      (10/30/50 Hz; randomized sequence) were applied. Cortical
                      silent periods (cSPs) were analyzed from electromyography
                      obtained from various face muscles. 30 Hz- and 50 Hz-rTMS
                      reliably evoked tongue movement disruption (ICC = 0.65)
                      at lower rTMS intensities compared to 10 Hz-rTMS or PP. CSPs
                      were elicited from the left hemisphere by all TMS protocols,
                      most reliably by PP (p < 0.001). Also, cSPs with longest
                      durations were induced by PP. Exploratory analyses of PP
                      suggest that the trials with strongest motor inhibitory
                      effects (presence of cSP) were associated with more
                      articulatory naming errors, hence hinting at the utility of
                      TMS-elicited, facial cSP for mapping of language production
                      areas. Higher-frequency rTMS and PP evoked stronger
                      inhibitory effects as compared to 10 Hz-rTMS during a
                      language task, thus enabling a probably more efficient and
                      tolerable routine for language mapping. The spatial
                      distribution of cranial muscle cSPs implies that TMS might
                      affect not only M1, but also distant parts of the language
                      network.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:30673935},
      UT           = {WOS:000465224800006},
      doi          = {10.1007/s10548-019-00698-9},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/860098},
}