001     860242
005     20240610115944.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1038/s41598-018-36896-x
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/21485
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a pmid:30679578
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000456553400104
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:54565385
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2019-01026
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 600
100 1 _ |a Huang, Yunfei
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)171956
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Traction force microscopy with optimized regularization and automated Bayesian parameter selection for comparing cells
260 _ _ |a [London]
|c 2019
|b Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1582018462_521
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Adherent cells exert traction forces on to their environment which allows them to migrate, to maintain tissue integrity, and to form complex multicellular structures during developmental morphogenesis. Traction force microscopy (TFM) enables the measurement of traction forces on an elastic substrate and thereby provides quantitative information on cellular mechanics in a perturbation-free fashion. In TFM, traction is usually calculated via the solution of a linear system, which is complicated by undersampled input data, acquisition noise, and large condition numbers for some methods. Therefore, standard TFM algorithms either employ data filtering or regularization. However, these approaches require a manual selection of filter- or regularization parameters and consequently exhibit a substantial degree of subjectiveness. This shortcoming is particularly serious when cells in different conditions are to be compared because optimal noise suppression needs to be adapted for every situation, which invariably results in systematic errors. Here, we systematically test the performance of new methods from computer vision and Bayesian inference for solving the inverse problem in TFM. We compare two classical schemes, L1- and L2-regularization, with three previously untested schemes, namely Elastic Net regularization, Proximal Gradient Lasso, and Proximal Gradient Elastic Net. Overall, we find that Elastic Net regularization, which combines L1 and L2 regularization, outperforms all other methods with regard to accuracy of traction reconstruction. Next, we develop two methods, Bayesian L2 regularization and Advanced Bayesian L2 regularization, for automatic, optimal L2 regularization. Using artificial data and experimental data, we show that these methods enable robust reconstruction of traction without requiring a difficult selection of regularization parameters specifically for each data set. Thus, Bayesian methods can mitigate the considerable uncertainty inherent in comparing cellular tractions in different conditions.
536 _ _ |a 552 - Engineering Cell Function (POF3-552)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-552
|c POF3-552
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Schell, Christoph
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Huber, Tobias B.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Şimşek, Ahmet Nihat
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)172801
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Hersch, Nils
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)128815
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Merkel, Rudolf
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)128833
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Gompper, Gerhard
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130665
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Sabass, Benedikt
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)171489
|b 7
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1038/s41598-018-36896-x
|g Vol. 9, no. 1, p. 539
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2615211-3
|n 1
|p 539
|t Scientific reports
|v 9
|y 2019
|x 2045-2322
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/860242/files/30036053060008571662INVOIC2676127718001%20%28002%29.pdf
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/860242/files/30036053060008571662INVOIC2676127718001%20%28002%29.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/860242/files/s41598-018-36896-x.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/860242/files/s41598-018-36896-x.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:860242
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)171956
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)172801
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)128815
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)128833
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130665
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)171489
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l BioSoft – Fundamentals for future Technologies in the fields of Soft Matter and Life Sciences
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-550
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-552
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Engineering Cell Function
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2019
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1040
|2 StatID
|b Zoological Record
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b SCI REP-UK : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)ICS-7-20110106
|k ICS-7
|l Biomechanik
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)ICS-2-20110106
|k ICS-2
|l Theorie der Weichen Materie und Biophysik
|x 1
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICS-7-20110106
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICS-2-20110106
980 _ _ |a APC
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBI-2-20200312
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBI-5-20200312
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-2-20090406


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21