% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Kawasaki:860470,
      author       = {Kawasaki, S. and Tada, T. and Persson, Bo},
      title        = {{A}dhesion and friction between glass and rubber in the dry
                      state and in water: role of contact hydrophobicity},
      journal      = {Soft matter},
      volume       = {14},
      number       = {26},
      issn         = {1744-6848},
      address      = {London},
      publisher    = {Royal Soc. of Chemistry},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2019-01224},
      pages        = {5428 - 5441},
      year         = {2018},
      abstract     = {We study the contact mechanics between 3 different tire
                      tread compounds and a smooth glass surface in water. We
                      study both adhesion and sliding friction at low-sliding
                      speeds. For 2 of the compounds the rubber–glass contact in
                      water is hydrophobic and we observe adhesion, and slip-stick
                      sliding friction dynamics. For one compound the contact is
                      hydrophilic, resulting in vanishing adhesion, and
                      steady-state (or smooth) sliding dynamics. We also show the
                      importance of dynamical scrape, both on the macroscopic
                      level and at the asperity level, which reduces the water
                      film thickness between the solids during slip. The
                      experiments show that the fluid is removed much faster from
                      the rubber–glass asperity contact regions for a
                      hydrophobic contact than for a hydrophilic contact. We also
                      study friction on sandblasted glass in water. In this case
                      all the compounds behave similarly and we conclude that no
                      dewetting occur in the asperity contact regions. We propose
                      that this is due to the increased surface roughness which
                      reduces the rubber–glass binding energy.},
      cin          = {IAS-1 / PGI-1 / JARA-FIT / JARA-HPC},
      ddc          = {530},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-1-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)PGI-1-20110106 /
                      $I:(DE-82)080009_20140620$ / $I:(DE-82)080012_20140620$},
      pnm          = {141 - Controlling Electron Charge-Based Phenomena
                      (POF3-141)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-141},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:29947413},
      UT           = {WOS:000437477200009},
      doi          = {10.1039/C8SM00847G},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/860470},
}