000860482 001__ 860482
000860482 005__ 20210130000525.0
000860482 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s00404-019-05060-9
000860482 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0003-9128
000860482 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0170-9925
000860482 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0932-0067
000860482 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1432-0711
000860482 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:30706182
000860482 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000459760600025
000860482 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:54934911
000860482 037__ $$aFZJ-2019-01236
000860482 082__ $$a610
000860482 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aAlt, C. D.$$b0
000860482 245__ $$aUrethral length and bladder neck behavior: can dynamic magnetic resonance imaging give the same results as introital ultrasound?
000860482 260__ $$aHeidelberg$$bSpringer$$c2019
000860482 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000860482 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000860482 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1551880777_21886
000860482 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000860482 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000860482 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000860482 500__ $$aThe trial was self-funded.
000860482 520__ $$aPurpose To compare dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) and introital ultrasound results with regard to urethral length measurements and the evaluation of bladder neck changes.MethodsRetrospective analyses of urethral length measurements and detection of bladder neck changes (rotated/vertical bladder neck descent, urethral funneling) were conducted in women—scheduled for surgical treatment with alloplastic material—who had undergone introital ultrasound and dMRI presurgery and 3 months postsurgery. Measurement differences between both imaging modalities were evaluated by assessing the confidence interval for the difference in means between the datasets using bootstrap analysis.ResultsBased on data from 40 patients (320 image series), the urethra could be clearly measured on every pre- and postsurgical dMRI dataset but not on preoperative ultrasound images in nine women during Valsalva maneuver due to a large cystocele. The estimation of the mean difference distribution based on 500,000 bootstrap resamples indicated that the urethral length was measured shorter by dMRI pre- and postsurgery at rest and postsurgery during Valsalva maneuver (median 1.6–3.1 mm) but longer by dMRI (median 0.2 mm) during Valsalva maneuver presurgery. Rotated/vertical bladder neck descent and urethral funneling diagnoses showed concordance of 67–74% in the direct comparison of patients; the estimation of the concordance indicated poorer outcomes with 50–72%.ConclusionsMetric information on urethral length from dMRI is comparable to that from introital ultrasound. dMRI is more advantageous in cases with an extended organ prolapse. At present, dMRI does not give the same diagnosis on bladder neck changes as introital ultrasound does.
000860482 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574$$a574 - Theory, modelling and simulation (POF3-574)$$cPOF3-574$$fPOF III$$x0
000860482 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000860482 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKatzenberger, S. M.$$b1
000860482 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHallscheidt, P.$$b2
000860482 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSohn, C.$$b3
000860482 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKauczor, H. U.$$b4
000860482 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131678$$aEickhoff, Simon$$b5
000860482 7001_ $$00000-0002-3543-4381$$aBrocker, K. A.$$b6$$eCorresponding author
000860482 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1458450-5$$a10.1007/s00404-019-05060-9$$n3$$p809-816$$tArchives of gynecology and obstetrics$$v299$$x1432-0711$$y2019
000860482 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/860482/files/Alt2019_Article_UrethralLengthAndBladderNeckBe-1.pdf$$yRestricted
000860482 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/860482/files/Alt2019_Article_UrethralLengthAndBladderNeckBe-1.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000860482 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:860482$$pVDB
000860482 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131678$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b5$$kFZJ
000860482 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$vTheory, modelling and simulation$$x0
000860482 9141_ $$y2019
000860482 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000860482 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000860482 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000860482 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000860482 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bARCH GYNECOL OBSTET : 2017
000860482 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000860482 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000860482 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000860482 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000860482 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000860482 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine
000860482 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000860482 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000860482 920__ $$lyes
000860482 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406$$kINM-7$$lGehirn & Verhalten$$x0
000860482 980__ $$ajournal
000860482 980__ $$aVDB
000860482 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
000860482 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED