% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Mahade:860510,
author = {Mahade, Satyapal and Zhou, Dapeng and Curry, Nicholas and
Markocsan, Nicolaie and Nylén, Per and Vaßen, Robert},
title = {{T}ailored microstructures of gadolinium zirconate/{YSZ}
multi-layered thermal barrier coatings produced by
suspension plasma spray: {D}urability and erosion testing},
journal = {Journal of materials processing technology},
volume = {264},
issn = {0924-0136},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {FZJ-2019-01246},
pages = {283 - 294},
year = {2019},
abstract = {This work employed an axial suspension plasma spray (SPS)
process to deposit two different gadolinium zirconate (GZ)
based triple layered thermal barrier coatings (TBCs). The
first was a ‘layered’ TBC (GZ dense/GZ/YSZ) where the
base layer was YSZ, intermediate layer was a relatively
porous GZ and the top layer was a relatively dense GZ. The
second triple layered TBC was a ‘composite’ TBC (GZ
dense/GZ + YSZ/YSZ) comprising of an YSZ base layer, a
GZ + YSZ intermediate layer and a dense GZ top layer.
The as sprayed TBCs (layered and composite) were
characterized using SEM/EDS and XRD. Two different methods
(water intrusion and image analysis) were used to measure
the porosity content of the as sprayed TBCs. Fracture
toughness measurements were made on the intermediate layers
(GZ + YSZ layer of the composite TBC and porous GZ layer
of the layered TBC respectively) using micro indentation
tests. The GZ + YSZ layer in the composite TBC was shown
to have a slightly higher fracture toughness than the
relatively porous GZ layer in the layered TBC. Erosion
performance of the as sprayed TBCs was evaluated at room
temperature where the composite TBC showed higher erosion
resistance than the layered TBC. However, in the burner rig
test conducted at 1400 °C, the layered TBC showed higher
thermal cyclic lifetime than the composite TBC. Failure
analysis of the thermally cycled and eroded TBCs was
performed using SEM and XRD.},
cin = {IEK-1},
ddc = {670},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-1-20101013},
pnm = {113 - Methods and Concepts for Material Development
(POF3-113)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-113},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000450135400028},
doi = {10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.09.016},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/860510},
}