000860677 001__ 860677
000860677 005__ 20210130000555.0
000860677 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1111/jiec.12840
000860677 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000488924100005
000860677 037__ $$aFZJ-2019-01343
000860677 041__ $$aEnglish
000860677 082__ $$a570
000860677 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)172948$$aWerker, Jasmin$$b0
000860677 245__ $$aWorking conditions in hydrogen production: A social life cycle assessment
000860677 260__ $$aOxford [u.a.]$$bWiley-Blackwell$$c2019
000860677 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000860677 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000860677 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1570606968_23572
000860677 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000860677 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000860677 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000860677 520__ $$aSocial impacts of novel technology can, parallel to environmental and economic consequences, influence its sustainability. By analyzing the case of hydrogen production by advanced alkaline water electrolysis (AEL) from a life cycle perspective, this paper illustrates the social implications of the manufacturing of the electrolyzer and hydrogen production when installed in Germany, Austria, and Spain. This paper complements previous environmental and economic assessments, which selected this set of countries based on their different structures in electricity production. The paper uses a mixed method design to analyze the social impact for the workers along the process chain. Appropriate indicators related to working conditions are selected on the basis of the UN Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. The focus on workers is chosen as a first example to test the relatively new Product Social Impact LifeCycle Assessment (PSILCA) database version 2.0. The results of the quantitative assessment are then complemented and compared through an investigation of the underlying raw data and a qualitative literature analysis. Overall, advancedAEL is found to have least social impact along the German process chain, followed by the Spanish and the Austrian. All three process chains show impacts on global upstream processes. In order to reduce social impact and ultimately contribute to Sustainable Development, policymakers and industry need to work together to further improve certain aspects of working conditions in different locations, particularly within global upstream processes.
000860677 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153$$a153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)$$cPOF3-153$$fPOF III$$x0
000860677 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)168163$$aWulf, Christina$$b1$$eCorresponding author
000860677 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)130493$$aZapp, Petra$$b2
000860677 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2035542-7$$a10.1111/jiec.12840$$n5$$p1052-1061$$tJournal of industrial ecology$$v23$$x1088-1980$$y2019
000860677 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/860677/files/Werker_et_al-2019-Journal_of_Industrial_Ecology.pdf$$yRestricted
000860677 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/860677/files/Werker_et_al-2019-Journal_of_Industrial_Ecology.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000860677 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:860677$$pVDB
000860677 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)172948$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000860677 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)168163$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000860677 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)130493$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000860677 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-150$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bEnergie$$lTechnologie, Innovation und Gesellschaft$$vAssessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security$$x0
000860677 9141_ $$y2019
000860677 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bJ IND ECOL : 2017
000860677 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000860677 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000860677 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000860677 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000860677 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000860677 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000860677 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000860677 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000860677 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000860677 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000860677 920__ $$lyes
000860677 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013$$kIEK-STE$$lSystemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung$$x0
000860677 980__ $$ajournal
000860677 980__ $$aVDB
000860677 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
000860677 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED