% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Werker:860677,
      author       = {Werker, Jasmin and Wulf, Christina and Zapp, Petra},
      title        = {{W}orking conditions in hydrogen production: {A} social
                      life cycle assessment},
      journal      = {Journal of industrial ecology},
      volume       = {23},
      number       = {5},
      issn         = {1088-1980},
      address      = {Oxford [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Wiley-Blackwell},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2019-01343},
      pages        = {1052-1061},
      year         = {2019},
      abstract     = {Social impacts of novel technology can, parallel to
                      environmental and economic consequences, influence its
                      sustainability. By analyzing the case of hydrogen production
                      by advanced alkaline water electrolysis (AEL) from a life
                      cycle perspective, this paper illustrates the social
                      implications of the manufacturing of the electrolyzer and
                      hydrogen production when installed in Germany, Austria, and
                      Spain. This paper complements previous environmental and
                      economic assessments, which selected this set of countries
                      based on their different structures in electricity
                      production. The paper uses a mixed method design to analyze
                      the social impact for the workers along the process chain.
                      Appropriate indicators related to working conditions are
                      selected on the basis of the UN Agenda 2030 Sustainable
                      Development Goals. The focus on workers is chosen as a first
                      example to test the relatively new Product Social Impact
                      LifeCycle Assessment (PSILCA) database version 2.0. The
                      results of the quantitative assessment are then complemented
                      and compared through an investigation of the underlying raw
                      data and a qualitative literature analysis. Overall,
                      advancedAEL is found to have least social impact along the
                      German process chain, followed by the Spanish and the
                      Austrian. All three process chains show impacts on global
                      upstream processes. In order to reduce social impact and
                      ultimately contribute to Sustainable Development,
                      policymakers and industry need to work together to further
                      improve certain aspects of working conditions in different
                      locations, particularly within global upstream processes.},
      cin          = {IEK-STE},
      ddc          = {570},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
      pnm          = {153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of
                      Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000488924100005},
      doi          = {10.1111/jiec.12840},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/860677},
}