% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Ohla:861092,
      author       = {Ohla, Kathrin and Yoshida, Ryusuke and Roper, Stephen D and
                      Di Lorenzo, Patricia M and Victor, Jonathan D and Boughter,
                      John D and Fletcher, Max and Katz, Donald B and Chaudhari,
                      Nirupa},
      title        = {{R}ecognizing taste: coding patterns along the neural axis
                      in mammals},
      journal      = {Chemical senses},
      volume       = {44},
      number       = {4},
      issn         = {1464-3553},
      address      = {Oxford},
      publisher    = {Oxford Univ. Press},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2019-01657},
      pages        = {237–247},
      year         = {2019},
      abstract     = {The gustatory system encodes information about chemical
                      identity, nutritional value, and concentration of sensory
                      stimuli before transmitting the signal from taste buds to
                      central neurons that process and transform the signal.
                      Deciphering the coding logic for taste quality requires
                      examining responses at each level along the neural
                      axis—from peripheral sensory organs to gustatory cortex.
                      From the earliest single-fiber recordings, it was clear that
                      some afferent neurons respond uniquely and others to stimuli
                      of multiple qualities. There is frequently a “best
                      stimulus” for a given neuron, leading to the suggestion
                      that taste exhibits “labeled line coding.” In the
                      extreme, a strict “labeled line” requires neurons and
                      pathways dedicated to single qualities (e.g., sweet, bitter,
                      etc.). At the other end of the spectrum, “across-fiber,”
                      “combinatorial,” or “ensemble” coding requires
                      minimal specific information to be imparted by a single
                      neuron. Instead, taste quality information is encoded by
                      simultaneous activity in ensembles of afferent fibers.
                      Further, “temporal coding” models have proposed that
                      certain features of taste quality may be embedded in the
                      cadence of impulse activity. Taste receptor proteins are
                      often expressed in nonoverlapping sets of cells in taste
                      buds apparently supporting “labeled lines.” Yet, taste
                      buds include both narrowly and broadly tuned cells. As
                      gustatory signals proceed to the hindbrain and on to higher
                      centers, coding becomes more distributed and temporal
                      patterns of activity become important. Here, we present the
                      conundrum of taste coding in the light of current
                      electrophysiological and imaging techniques at several
                      levels of the gustatory processing pathway.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {540},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:30788507},
      UT           = {WOS:000483149200001},
      doi          = {10.1093/chemse/bjz013},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/861092},
}