Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Modelling of tungsten erosion and deposition in the divertor of JET-ILW in comparison to experimental findings > print

001     861555
005     20240711113610.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.nme.2019.01.004
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/21885
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000460107500041
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2019-02006
082 _ _ |a 624
100 1 _ |a Kirschner, A.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)2620
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Modelling of tungsten erosion and deposition in the divertor of JET-ILW in comparison to experimental findings
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2019
|b Elsevier
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1553181638_3480
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The erosion, transport and deposition of tungsten in the outer divertor of JET-ILW has been studied for an H-Mode discharge with low frequency ELMs. For this specific case with an inter-ELM electron temperature at the strike point of about 20 eV, tungsten sputtering between ELMs is almost exclusively due to beryllium impurity and self-sputtering. However, during ELMs tungsten sputtering due to deuterium becomes important and even dominates. The amount of simulated local deposition of tungsten relative to the amount of sputtered tungsten in between ELMs is very high and reaches values of 99% for an electron density of 5E13 cm−3 at the strike point and electron temperatures between 10 and 30 eV. Smaller deposition values are simulated with reduced electron density. The direction of the B-field significantly influences the local deposition and leads to a reduction if the E × B drift directs towards the scrape-off-layer. Also, the thermal force can reduce the tungsten deposition, however, an ion temperature gradient of about 0.1 eV/mm or larger is needed for a significant effect. The tungsten deposition simulated during ELMs reaches values of about 98% assuming ELM parameters according to free-streaming model. The measured WI emission profiles in between and within ELMs have been reproduced by the simulation. The contribution to the overall net tungsten erosion during ELMs is about 5 times larger than the one in between ELMs for the studied case. However, this is due to the rather low electron temperature in between ELMs, which leads to deuterium impact energies below the sputtering threshold for tungsten.
536 _ _ |a 174 - Plasma-Wall-Interaction (POF3-174)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-174
|c POF3-174
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Brezinsek, S.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129976
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Huber, Alexander
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130040
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Meigs, A.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Sergienko, G.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130158
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Tskhakaya, D.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Borodin, D.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)7884
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Groth, M.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)171218
|b 7
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Jachmich, S.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130043
|b 8
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Romazanov, J.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)165905
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Wiesen, S.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)5247
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Linsmeier, Ch.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)157640
|b 11
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.nme.2019.01.004
|g Vol. 18, p. 239 - 244
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2808888-8
|p 239 - 244
|t Nuclear materials and energy
|v 18
|y 2019
|x 2352-1791
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/861555/files/1-s2.0-S2352179118302333-main.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/861555/files/1-s2.0-S2352179118302333-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:861555
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)2620
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129976
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130040
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130158
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)7884
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)171218
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130043
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 9
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)165905
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 10
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)5247
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 11
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)157640
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Kernfusion
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-170
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-174
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|v Plasma-Wall-Interaction
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Energie
914 1 _ |y 2019
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0112
|2 StatID
|b Emerging Sources Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Peer review
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013
|k IEK-4
|l Plasmaphysik
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IFN-1-20101013

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21