% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Gras:861672,
author = {Gras, Vincent and Farrher, Ezequiel and Grinberg, Farida
and Shah, N. J.},
title = {{D}iffusion-weighted {DESS} protocol optimization for
simultaneous mapping of the mean diffusivity, proton density
and relaxation times at 3 {T}esla},
journal = {Magnetic resonance in medicine},
volume = {78},
number = {1},
issn = {0740-3194},
address = {New York, NY [u.a.]},
publisher = {Wiley-Liss},
reportid = {FZJ-2019-02109},
pages = {130 - 141},
year = {2017},
abstract = {PurposeTo design a general framework for the optimization
of an MRI protocol based on the the diffusion‐weighted
dual‐echo steady‐state (DW‐DESS) sequence, enabling
quantitative and simultaneous mapping of proton density
(PD), relaxation times
urn:x-wiley:07403194:media:mrm26353:mrm26353-math-0001 and
urn:x-wiley:07403194:media:mrm26353:mrm26353-math-0002 and
diffusion coefficient D.MethodsA parameterization of the
DW‐DESS sequence minimizing the Cramér‐Rao lower bound
of each parameter estimate was proposed and tested in a
phantom experiment. An extension of the protocol was
implemented for brain imaging to return the rotationally
invariant mean diffusivity (MD).ResultsIn an NiCl2‐doped
agar gel phantom wherein
urn:x-wiley:07403194:media:mrm26353:mrm26353-math-0003 ms,
the parameter estimation errors were below $3\%$ for PD and
urn:x-wiley:07403194:media:mrm26353:mrm26353-math-0004 and
below $7\%$ for
urn:x-wiley:07403194:media:mrm26353:mrm26353-math-0005 and D
while the measured signal‐to‐noise ratio always exceeded
20. In the human brain, the in vivo parametric maps obtained
were overall in reasonable agreement with gold standard
measurements, despite a broadening of the distributions due
to physiological motion.ConclusionWithin the optimization
framework presented here, DW‐DESS images can be
quantitatively interpreted to yield four intrinsic
parameters of the tissue. Currently, the method is limited
by the sensitivity of the DW‐DESS sequence in terms of
physiological motion. Magn Reson Med 78:130–141, 2017. ©
2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine},
cin = {INM-4 / INM-11 / JARA-BRAIN},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-11-20170113 /
$I:(DE-82)080010_20140620$},
pnm = {573 - Neuroimaging (POF3-573)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:27476684},
UT = {WOS:000403803900013},
doi = {10.1002/mrm.26353},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/861672},
}