% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{vonHelden:862139,
      author       = {von Helden, S. and Malzbender, J. and Krüger, M.},
      title        = {{M}echanical {P}roperties, {W}ear {R}esistance and
                      {S}urface {D}amage of {G}lasses and {M}g{A}l2{O}4 {S}pinel
                      {C}eramic {A}fter {A}brasion and {S}cratch {E}xposure},
      journal      = {Ceramics international},
      volume       = {45},
      number       = {8},
      issn         = {0272-8842},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2019-02493},
      pages        = {10765},
      year         = {2019},
      abstract     = {A transparent spinel ceramic is compared to different types
                      of glasses, including unhardened and hardened material, as
                      well as a polymer in terms of mechanical behavior and
                      optical appearance before and after mechanical exposure. The
                      mechanical behavior of the materials is compared on the
                      basis of depth-sensitive indentation and ring-on-ring
                      bending tests, deriving hardness, elastic modulus, and
                      fracture stress data. The focus of this research is the
                      analysis of specimens after certain exposure times of sand
                      blasting and different loads during scratch tests via weight
                      balance, confocal laser scanning, and optical microscopes to
                      assess wear resistance including surface roughness, mass
                      loss, critical loads, and initial damage. Results are
                      critically discussed in terms of differences in the
                      performance of the diverse materials and the correlation of
                      optical appearance, abrasive behavior, and apparent scratch
                      testing damage. The overall comparison of properties and
                      application relevant to damage resistance indicates that the
                      tested transparent ceramic and the surface hardened Gorilla
                      glass are superior to all other tested variants.},
      cin          = {IEK-2},
      ddc          = {670},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-2-20101013},
      pnm          = {111 - Efficient and Flexible Power Plants (POF3-111)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-111},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000465058500135},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.02.150},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/862139},
}