000862346 001__ 862346
000862346 005__ 20210130001309.0
000862346 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1088/1742-5468/ab0c13
000862346 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000464052200001
000862346 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:58785837
000862346 037__ $$aFZJ-2019-02681
000862346 082__ $$a530
000862346 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aYe, Rui$$b0
000862346 245__ $$aExperimental study of pedestrian flow through right-angled corridor: uni- and bidirectional scenarios
000862346 260__ $$aBristol$$bIOP Publ.$$c2019
000862346 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000862346 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000862346 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1555480045_5262
000862346 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000862346 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000862346 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000862346 520__ $$aCorners can be commonly observed in most building facilities. However, pedestrians' turning behavior at the corners, especially in collective movements, is rarely studied and not fully understood. To investigate the effects of such configuration on pedestrian flow, both uni- and bidirectional experiments were conducted in a right-angled corridor. From the fundamental diagram, it is found that pedestrians in our experiments are less sensitive to high-density situations and the velocity at high densities tends to be larger than observed values in former studies. Besides, in our experiments, no noticeable difference is observed between the fundamental diagrams in uni- and bidirectional scenarios for densities below 2 ped m−2. According to the density profile, pedestrians in unidirectional turning movements tend to seek the shortest path, whereas their followed path is more influenced by the detour behavior against encounters when it comes to bidirectional scenarios. Besides, due to the collision avoidance behavior and lane formation phenomenon in bidirectional scenarios, the highest density does not emerge at the innermost side of the corner, but is slightly outward in high-density case. According to the position-velocity relation, generally speaking, pedestrians' velocity will decrease as they approach the corner. But for the outer most lane in bidirectional scenarios, pedestrians' velocity may increase as there is more space available. As for angular velocity, we observe that generally in bidirectional streams, pedestrians from the inner lane are more likely to possess a higher value than those in outer lane. But some exceptional cases exist, for example, when a certain inner lane is severely constrained or pedestrians from outer lane try to avoid physical contact with those in inner lane. The results obtained can serve as a basis for model validation and offer more insights into the dynamics of pedestrians in geometries with corners.
000862346 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511$$a511 - Computational Science and Mathematical Methods (POF3-511)$$cPOF3-511$$fPOF III$$x0
000862346 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000862346 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)132077$$aChraibi, Mohcine$$b1$$ufzj
000862346 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLiu, Chi$$b2
000862346 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLian, Liping$$b3
000862346 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aZeng, Yiping$$b4
000862346 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aZhang, Jun$$b5
000862346 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSong, Weiguo$$b6$$eCorresponding author
000862346 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2138944-5$$a10.1088/1742-5468/ab0c13$$gVol. 2019, no. 4, p. 043401 -$$n4$$p043401 -$$tJournal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment$$v2019$$x1742-5468$$y2019
000862346 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/862346/files/Ye_2019_J._Stat._Mech._2019_043401.pdf$$yRestricted
000862346 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/862346/files/Ye_2019_J._Stat._Mech._2019_043401.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000862346 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:862346$$pVDB
000862346 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)132077$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000862346 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-510$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lSupercomputing & Big Data$$vComputational Science and Mathematical Methods$$x0
000862346 9141_ $$y2019
000862346 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000862346 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bJ STAT MECH-THEORY E : 2017
000862346 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000862346 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000862346 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000862346 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000862346 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000862346 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
000862346 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000862346 920__ $$lyes
000862346 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-7-20180321$$kIAS-7$$lZivile Sicherheitsforschung$$x0
000862346 980__ $$ajournal
000862346 980__ $$aVDB
000862346 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IAS-7-20180321
000862346 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED