000862423 001__ 862423
000862423 005__ 20210130001345.0
000862423 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/22091
000862423 037__ $$aFZJ-2019-02745
000862423 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)159313$$aKlosterhalfen, Anne$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000862423 1112_ $$aEGU General Assembly 2019$$cWien$$d2019-04-07 - 2019-04-12$$gEGU 2019$$wAustria
000862423 245__ $$aSensitivity Analysis of a Source Partitioning Method for H$_2$O and CO$_2$ Fluxes via Large Eddy Simulations
000862423 260__ $$c2019
000862423 3367_ $$033$$2EndNote$$aConference Paper
000862423 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aINPROCEEDINGS
000862423 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aconferenceObject
000862423 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aCONFERENCE_POSTER
000862423 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Conference Poster
000862423 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)24$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aPoster$$bposter$$mposter$$s1556000441_22955$$xAfter Call
000862423 500__ $$aAlso supported by Netherlands Science Foundation under contract NWO 15774
000862423 520__ $$aFor an assessment of the role of soil and vegetation in the climate system, a further understanding of the fluxcomponents of H$_2$O and CO$_2$ and their interaction with physical conditions and physiological functioning ofplants and ecosystems is necessary. Scanlon and Sahu (2008) and Scanlon and Kustas (2010) proposed a sourcepartitioning method (SK10 in the following) to estimate the flux components transpiration, evaporation, photosynthesis,and respiration on the ecosystem scale obtained by the eddy covariance method. High frequency timeseries are needed, and the source partitioning is estimated based on the separate application of the flux-variancesimilarity theory to the stomatal and non-stomatal components of the regarded fluxes, as well as on additionalassumptions on water use efficiency (WUE) on the leaf scale. The estimated WUE has been found to exert a stronginfluence on the performance of the partitioning method.\\Evaluations of SK10 with field observations suffer from the fact that the real source partitioning is usuallyunknown, and that various disturbances may influence the correlation between H$_2$O and CO$_2$ fluctuations at studysites. Therefore, we conducted Large Eddy Simulations (LES), simulating the turbulent transport of H$_2$O andCO$_2$ under consideration of contrasting vertical sink-source-distributions in the canopy, and of soil sources withvarying magnitudes. SK10 was applied to these synthetic high-frequency data and the partitioning performancecould be evaluated depending on canopy type, measurement height, and given sink-source-distributions. For asatisfying performance of SK10, a certain degree of decorrelation of the H$_2$O and CO$_2$ fluctuations was needed,which was enhanced for observations within the roughness sublayer, as well as by a clear separation between soiland canopy sources. The expected dependence of the partitioning results to the WUE input could be observed,where an incorrect estimation of WUE affected the flux components of soil sources stronger than components ofthe canopy sink/source. As a new finding, our LES study indicated that next to a precise WUE estimation, thevalidity of the key assumptions made by Scanlon and Sahu (2008) in the method’s derivation is a crucial pointfor a correct application of SK10. Therefore, a thorough assessment of the conditions at study sites affecting thevalidity of these assumptions would be necessary.\\Scanlon, T.M., Sahu, P., 2008. On the correlation structure of water vapor and carbon dioxide in the atmosphericsurface layer: A basis for flux partitioning. Water Resources Research 44 (10), W10418, 15 pp,https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006932.\\Scanlon, T.M., Kustas, W.P., 2010. Partitioning carbon dioxide and water vapor fluxes using correlation analysis.Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 150 (1), 89-99, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.09.005.
000862423 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000862423 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)BMBF-01LN1313A$$aIDAS-GHG - Instrumental and Data-driven Approaches to Source-Partitioning of Greenhouse Gas Fluxes: Comparison, Combination, Advancement (BMBF-01LN1313A)$$cBMBF-01LN1313A$$fNachwuchsgruppen Globaler Wandel 4+1$$x1
000862423 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMoene, Arnold F.$$b1
000862423 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)144420$$aSchmidt, Marius$$b2$$ufzj
000862423 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aScanlon, Todd M.$$b3
000862423 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aVereecken, Harry$$b4$$ufzj
000862423 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129461$$aGraf, Alexander$$b5$$ufzj
000862423 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/862423/files/Poster_EGU2019_Klosterhalfen.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000862423 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/862423/files/Poster_EGU2019_Klosterhalfen.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000862423 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:862423$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000862423 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)159313$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000862423 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMeteorology and Air Quality Group, Wageningen University and Research$$b1
000862423 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)144420$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000862423 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-HGF)0$$a Department of Environment Sciences, University of Virginia$$b3
000862423 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000862423 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129461$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b5$$kFZJ
000862423 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000862423 9141_ $$y2019
000862423 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000862423 920__ $$lyes
000862423 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000862423 980__ $$aposter
000862423 980__ $$aVDB
000862423 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000862423 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000862423 9801_ $$aFullTexts