000862430 001__ 862430
000862430 005__ 20220930130210.0
000862430 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3389/fenvs.2019.00047
000862430 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/22087
000862430 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000465460700001
000862430 037__ $$aFZJ-2019-02746
000862430 082__ $$a333.7
000862430 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)156153$$aLiu, Shurong$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000862430 245__ $$aHydroxylamine Contributes More to Abiotic N2O Production in Soils Than Nitrite
000862430 260__ $$aLausanne$$bFrontiers Media$$c2019
000862430 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000862430 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000862430 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1563276479_1217
000862430 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000862430 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000862430 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000862430 520__ $$aNitrite (NO−2) and hydroxylamine (NH2OH) are important intermediates of the nitrogen (N) cycle in soils. They play a crucial role in the loss of nitrous oxide (N2O) and nitric oxide (NO) from soil due to their high reactivity. In this study, we collected soil samples from three ecosystems (grassland, arable land, and forest with a riparian zone) and explored the contribution of NO−2 and NH2OH to N2O formation in the different soils after exposure to oxic or anoxic pre-treatment. In addition, the importance of abiotic processes on the N2O formation from the two intermediates was studied by irradiating the soil samples with γ-irradiation. Our results demonstrate that NO−2 addition induced the largest N2O production in the grassland soil, followed by the forest and arable soils. Only 9–39% of the produced N2O after NO−2 addition came from abiotic processes. NH2OH addition increased N2O emissions the most from the arable soil, followed by the grassland and forest soils. The conversion of NH2OH to N2O was mostly (73–93%) abiotic. Anoxic pre-treatment decreased N2O production from NH2OH remarkably, especially for the grassland soil, while it increased N2O production from NO−2 for most of the soils. Correlation analysis showed that NO−2 effects on N2O production were strongly correlated to NH+4 content in soils with anoxic pre-treatment, while NH2OH effects on N2O production were strongly correlated to soil Mn and C content in soils with oxic pre-treatment. Our results indicate that NH2OH plays an important role for abiotic N2O formation in soils with low C and high Mn content, while the effect of NO−2 was important mainly during biotic N2O production. Anoxic periods prior to N addition may increase the contribution of NO−2, but reduce the contribution of NH2OH, to soil N2O formation.
000862430 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000862430 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000862430 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchloter, Michael$$b1
000862430 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHu, Ronggui$$b2
000862430 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aVereecken, Harry$$b3
000862430 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)142357$$aBrüggemann, Nicolas$$b4
000862430 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2741535-1$$a10.3389/fenvs.2019.00047$$gVol. 7, p. 47$$nArticle 47$$p1-10$$tFrontiers in Environmental Science$$v7$$x2296-665X$$y2019
000862430 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/862430/files/2019-0169359-4.pdf
000862430 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/862430/files/fenvs-07-00047.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000862430 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/862430/files/fenvs-07-00047.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000862430 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/862430/files/2019-0169359-4.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa
000862430 8767_ $$82019-0169359-4$$92019-03-27$$d2019-07-16$$eAPC$$jDeposit$$lDeposit: Frontiers$$z1615.00 USD
000862430 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:862430$$popenCost$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pdriver$$pOpenAPC$$popen_access$$popenaire$$pdnbdelivery
000862430 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)156153$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000862430 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000862430 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)142357$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000862430 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000862430 9141_ $$y2019
000862430 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000862430 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000862430 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal
000862430 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000862430 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000862430 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review
000862430 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000862430 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000862430 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000862430 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000862430 980__ $$ajournal
000862430 980__ $$aVDB
000862430 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000862430 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000862430 980__ $$aAPC