Gast ::
| Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Changing attitudes and conflicting arguments: Reviewing stakeholder communication on electricity technologies in Germany > print |
| Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Changing attitudes and conflicting arguments: Reviewing stakeholder communication on electricity technologies in Germany > print |
| 001 | 862867 | ||
| 005 | 20210130001658.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1016/j.erss.2019.04.012 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/22502 |2 Handle |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:60940915 |2 altmetric |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000476872300010 |2 WOS |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2019-03056 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a English |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 624 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Shamon, Hawal |0 P:(DE-Juel1)168187 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |u fzj |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Changing attitudes and conflicting arguments: Reviewing stakeholder communication on electricity technologies in Germany |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Amsterdam [u.a.] |c 2019 |b Elsevier |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1563429801_18333 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a In Germany, the public is exposed to pro and counter arguments regarding different electricity generation technologies. To assess the attitudinal consequences of these arguments, we presented a balanced set of seven pro and seven counter arguments concerning one of six electricity-generating technologies (i.e., coal power stations, gas power stations, onshore wind power stations, offshore wind power stations, open space photovoltaics, or biomass power plants) to respondents with heterogeneous socio-demographic characteristics. We asked them to rate the strength of each argument and report their perceived familiarity with each argument. Based on the respondents’ answers, we examined the tendencies that underlie the process of evaluating arguments using different theoretical approaches. We found that persuasiveness ratings are driven by arguments’ compatibility with respondents’ initial attitudes, arguments’ quality (i.e., strong, moderate, or weak), and respondents’ perceived familiarity with the arguments. Furthermore, we determined the extent to which respondents’ initial attitudes toward an electricity-generating technology, measured immediately before evaluation of 14 conflicting arguments, changed after exposure to the arguments. Unlike former studies on attitude polarization, we examined conditional probabilities instead of the absolute level of global attitude change or the marginal probabilities of attitude change and persistence. This allowed for more nuanced (re)examination of the issue and showed, among other results, that attitude polarization is the exception rather than the rule. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153 |c POF3-153 |f POF III |x 0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Schumann, Diana |0 P:(DE-Juel1)130485 |b 1 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Fischer, Wolfgang |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Heinrichs, Heidi |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Voegele, Stefan |0 P:(DE-Juel1)130491 |b 4 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm |0 P:(DE-Juel1)130467 |b 5 |u fzj |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1016/j.erss.2019.04.012 |0 PERI:(DE-600)2763226-X |p 106-121 |t Energy research & social science |v 55 |y 2019 |x 2214-6296 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/862867/files/Shamon%20et%20al%202019%20Changing%20Attitudes.pdf |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |x pdfa |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/862867/files/Shamon%20et%20al%202019%20Changing%20Attitudes.pdf?subformat=pdfa |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:862867 |p openaire |p open_access |p VDB |p driver |p dnbdelivery |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 0 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)168187 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 1 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)130485 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 4 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)130491 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 5 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)130467 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |l Technologie, Innovation und Gesellschaft |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-150 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100 |v Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |b Energie |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2019 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0130 |2 StatID |b Social Sciences Citation Index |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b ENERGY RES SOC SCI : 2017 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1180 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF < 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |
| 920 | _ | _ | |l yes |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013 |k IEK-STE |l Systemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013 |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|