000862870 001__ 862870
000862870 005__ 20240712100840.0
000862870 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.5194/acp-19-5805-2019
000862870 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/22214
000862870 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000466855400003
000862870 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:59855869
000862870 037__ $$aFZJ-2019-03057
000862870 082__ $$a550
000862870 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)169568$$aRobrecht, Sabine$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000862870 245__ $$aMechanism of ozone loss under enhanced water vapour conditions in the mid-latitude lower stratosphere in summer
000862870 260__ $$aKatlenburg-Lindau$$bEGU$$c2019
000862870 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000862870 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000862870 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1562062852_18411
000862870 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000862870 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000862870 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000862870 520__ $$aWater vapour convectively injected into the mid-latitude lowermost stratosphere could affect stratospheric ozone. The associated potential ozone loss process requires low temperatures together with elevated water vapour mixing ratios. Since this ozone loss is initiated by heterogeneous chlorine activation on liquid aerosols, an increase in sulfate aerosol surface area due to a volcanic eruption or geoengineering could increase the likelihood of its occurrence. However, the chemical mechanism of this ozone loss process has not yet been analysed in sufficient detail and its sensitivity to various conditions is not yet clear. Under conditions of climate change associated with an increase in greenhouse gases, both a stratospheric cooling and an increase in water vapour convectively injected into the stratosphere are expected. Understanding the influence of low temperatures, elevated water vapour and enhanced sulfate particles on this ozone loss mechanism is a key step in estimating the impact of climate change and potential sulfate geoengineering on mid-latitude ozone.Here, we analyse the ozone loss mechanism and its sensitivity to various stratospheric conditions in detail. By conducting a box-model study with the Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS), chemistry was simulated along a 7 d backward trajectory. This trajectory was calculated neglecting mixing of neighbouring air masses. Chemical simulations were initialized using measurements taken during the Studies of Emissions and Atmospheric Composition, Clouds and Climate Coupling by Regional Surveys (SEAC4RS) aircraft campaign (2013, Texas), which encountered an elevated water vapour mixing ratio of 10.6 ppmv at a pressure level around 100 hPa. We present a detailed analysis of the ozone loss mechanism, including the chlorine activation, chlorine-catalysed ozone loss cycles, maintenance of activated chlorine and the role of active nitrogen oxide radicals (NOx). Focussing on a realistic trajectory in a temperature range from 197 to 202 K, a threshold in water vapour of 10.6 ppmv has to be exceeded and maintained for stratospheric ozone loss to occur. We investigated the sensitivity of the water vapour threshold to temperature, sulfate content, inorganic chlorine (Cly), inorganic nitrogen (NOy) and inorganic bromine (Bry). The water vapour threshold is mainly determined by the temperature and sulfate content. However, the amount of ozone loss depends on Cly, Bry and the duration of the time period over which chlorine activation can be maintained. NOy affects both the potential of ozone formation and the balance between reactions yielding chlorine activation and deactivation, which determines the water vapour threshold. Our results show that in order to deplete ozone, a chlorine activation time of 24 to 36 h for conditions of the water vapour threshold with low temperatures must be maintained. A maximum ozone loss of 9 % was found for a 20 ppmv water vapour mixing ratio using North American Monsoon (NAM) tropopause standard conditions with a chemical box-model simulation along a realistic trajectory. For the same trajectory, using observed conditions (of 10.6 ppmv H2O), the occurrence of simulated ozone loss was dependent on the sulfate amount assumed. Detailed analysis of current and future possibilities is needed to assess whether enhanced water vapour conditions in the summertime mid-latitude lower stratosphere lead to significant ozone loss
000862870 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-244$$a244 - Composition and dynamics of the upper troposphere and middle atmosphere (POF3-244)$$cPOF3-244$$fPOF III$$x0
000862870 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129164$$aVogel, Bärbel$$b1$$ufzj
000862870 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129122$$aGrooss, Jens-Uwe$$b2$$ufzj
000862870 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRosenlof, K.$$b3
000862870 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aThornberry, T.$$b4
000862870 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRollins, A.$$b5
000862870 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129131$$aKrämer, Martina$$b6$$ufzj
000862870 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aChristensen, L.$$b7
000862870 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129138$$aMüller, Rolf$$b8$$ufzj
000862870 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2069847-1$$a10.5194/acp-19-5805-2019$$p5805-5833$$tAtmospheric chemistry and physics$$v19$$x1680-7316$$y2019
000862870 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/862870/files/invoice_Helmholtz-PUC-2019-44%20.pdf
000862870 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/862870/files/acp-19-5805-2019.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000862870 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/862870/files/acp-19-5805-2019.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000862870 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/862870/files/invoice_Helmholtz-PUC-2019-44%20.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa
000862870 8767_ $$8Helmholtz-PUC-2019-44$$92019-07-01$$d2019-07-02$$eAPC$$jZahlung erfolgt$$pacp-2018-1193
000862870 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:862870$$pdnbdelivery$$popenCost$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pdriver$$pOpenAPC$$popen_access$$popenaire
000862870 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)169568$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000862870 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129164$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000862870 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129122$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000862870 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129131$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b6$$kFZJ
000862870 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129138$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b8$$kFZJ
000862870 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-244$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-240$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lAtmosphäre und Klima$$vComposition and dynamics of the upper troposphere and middle atmosphere$$x0
000862870 9141_ $$y2019
000862870 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000862870 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000862870 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
000862870 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bATMOS CHEM PHYS : 2017
000862870 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal
000862870 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000862870 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000862870 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000862870 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000862870 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000862870 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Peer review
000862870 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bATMOS CHEM PHYS : 2017
000862870 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000862870 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000862870 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000862870 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013$$kIEK-7$$lStratosphäre$$x0
000862870 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000862870 980__ $$ajournal
000862870 980__ $$aVDB
000862870 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
000862870 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000862870 980__ $$aAPC
000862870 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-4-20101013