001     863610
005     20210130002220.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1111/jnp.12191
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1748-6645
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1748-6653
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/24975
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a pmid:31207114
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000537120500004
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2019-03622
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Ubben, Simon D.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Deficient allo-centric visuospatial processing contributes to apraxic deficits in sub-acute right hemisphere stroke
260 _ _ |a Hoboken, NJ [u.a.]
|c 2020
|b Wiley
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1591203377_926
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a While visuospatial deficits are well‐characterized cognitive sequelae of right hemisphere (RH ) stroke, apraxic deficits in RH stroke remain poorly understood. Likewise, very little is known about the association between apraxic and visuospatial deficits in RH stroke or about the putative common or differential pathophysiology underlying these deficits. Therefore, we examined the behavioural and lesion patterns of apraxic deficits (pantomime of object use and bucco‐facial imitation) and visuospatial deficits (line bisection and letter cancellation tasks) in 50 sub‐acute RH stroke patients. Using principal component analysis (PCA ), we characterized the relationship between the two deficits. We hypothesized that any interaction of these neuropsychological measures may be influenced by the demands of ego‐centric/space‐based and/or allo‐centric/object‐based processing. Contralesional visuospatial deficits were common in our clinically representative patient sample, affecting more than half of RH stroke patients. Furthermore, about one‐third of all patients demonstrated apraxic deficits. PCA revealed that pantomiming and the imitation of bucco‐facial gestures loaded clearly on a first component (PCA 1), while letter cancellation loaded heavily on a second component (PCA 2). For line bisection, overall mean deviation loaded on PCA 1, while the difference between the mean deviations in contra‐ versus ipsilesional space loaded on PCA 2. These results suggest that PCA 1 represents allo‐centric/object‐based processing and PCA 2 ego‐centric/space‐based processing. This interpretation was corroborated by the statistical lesion analyses with the component scores. Data suggest that disturbed allo‐centric/object‐based processing contributes to apraxic pantomime and imitation deficits in (sub‐acute) RH stroke.
536 _ _ |a 572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|c POF3-572
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Fink, Gereon R.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Kaesberg, Stephanie
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Kalbe, Elke
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Kessler, Josef
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Vossel, Simone
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131745
|b 5
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Weiss, Peter H.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131748
|b 6
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1111/jnp.12191
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2380753-2
|n 2
|p 242-259
|t The journal of neuropsychology
|v 14
|y 2020
|x 1748-6645
856 4 _ |y Published on 2019-06-17. Available in OpenAccess from 2020-06-17.
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/863610/files/Ubben_2018_Post%20Print_Journal%20of%20Neuropsychology_Deficient%20allo-centric%20visuospatial%20processing%20contributes%20to%20apraxic%20deficits%20in%20sub-acute%20right%20hemisphere%20stroke.pdf
856 4 _ |y Published on 2019-06-17. Available in OpenAccess from 2020-06-17.
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/863610/files/Ubben_2018_Post%20Print_Journal%20of%20Neuropsychology_Deficient%20allo-centric%20visuospatial%20processing%20contributes%20to%20apraxic%20deficits%20in%20sub-acute%20right%20hemisphere%20stroke.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:863610
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a INM-3
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131745
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131748
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v (Dys-)function and Plasticity
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0130
|2 StatID
|b Social Sciences Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a Embargoed OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J NEUROPSYCHOL : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1180
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
|k INM-3
|l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21