001     863645
005     20210130002242.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.037
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1053-8119
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1095-9572
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a altmetric:62623084
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:31229658
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000481579300012
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a 2128/23402
|2 Handle
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2019-03656
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Ngo, Gia H.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Beyond consensus: Embracing heterogeneity in curated neuroimaging meta-analysis
260 _ _ |a Orlando, Fla.
|c 2019
|b Academic Press
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1562835360_29361
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Coordinate-based meta-analysis can provide important insights into mind-brain relationships. A popular approach for curated small-scale meta-analysis is activation likelihood estimation (ALE), which identifies brain regions consistently activated across a selected set of experiments, such as within a functional domain or mental disorder. ALE can also be utilized in meta-analytic co-activation modeling (MACM) to identify brain regions consistently co-activated with a seed region. Therefore, ALE aims to find consensus across experiments, treating heterogeneity across experiments as noise. However, heterogeneity within an ALE analysis of a functional domain might indicate the presence of functional sub-domains. Similarly, heterogeneity within a MACM analysis might indicate the involvement of a seed region in multiple co-activation patterns that are dependent on task contexts. Here, we demonstrate the use of the author-topic model to automatically determine if heterogeneities within ALE-type meta-analyses can be robustly explained by a small number of latent patterns. In the first application, the author-topic modeling of experiments involving self-generated thought (N = 179) revealed cognitive components fractionating the default network. In the second application, the author-topic model revealed that the left inferior frontal junction (IFJ) participated in multiple task-dependent co-activation patterns (N = 323). Furthermore, the author-topic model estimates compared favorably with spatial independent component analysis in both simulation and real data. Overall, the results suggest that the author-topic model is a flexible tool for exploring heterogeneity in ALE-type meta-analyses that might arise from functional sub-domains, mental disorder subtypes or task-dependent co-activation patterns. Code for this study is publicly available (https://github.com/ThomasYeoLab/CBIG/tree/master/stable_projects/meta-analysis/Ngo2019_AuthorTopic).
536 _ _ |a 574 - Theory, modelling and simulation (POF3-574)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574
|c POF3-574
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Eickhoff, Simon B.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Nguyen, Minh
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Sevinc, Gunes
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Fox, Peter T.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Spreng, R. Nathan
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Yeo, B. T. Thomas
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.037
|g Vol. 200, p. 142 - 158
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1471418-8
|p 142 - 158
|t NeuroImage
|v 200
|y 2019
|x 1053-8119
856 4 _ |y Published on 2019-06-20. Available in OpenAccess from 2020-06-20.
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/863645/files/Ngo19.pdf
856 4 _ |y Published on 2019-06-20. Available in OpenAccess from 2020-06-20.
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/863645/files/Ngo19.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:863645
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Theory, modelling and simulation
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2019
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a Embargoed OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b NEUROIMAGE : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b NEUROIMAGE : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
|k INM-7
|l Gehirn & Verhalten
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21