guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Comparative life cycle assessment of electricity generation by different wind turbine types > print |
| Home > Publications database > Comparative life cycle assessment of electricity generation by different wind turbine types > print |
| 001 | 863775 | ||
| 005 | 20210131030943.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.058 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 0959-6526 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1879-1786 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000479025500045 |2 WOS |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:63824752 |2 altmetric |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2019-03771 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a English |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 330 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Schreiber, Andrea |0 P:(DE-Juel1)130483 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |u fzj |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Comparative life cycle assessment of electricity generation by different wind turbine types |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Amsterdam [u.a.] |c 2019 |b Elsevier Science |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1563428618_18825 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a Wind turbines produce electricity with hardly any emissions during operation. Most environmental impacts are associated with their manufacture. This work performs a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impacts of different 3 MW power class wind turbines at a fictive onshore site in Germany. The three most frequently installed onshore turbine types are considered: geared converter with doubly-fed induction generator (DFIG), direct driven synchronous generator (DDSG) electrically excited and direct drive permanent magnet synchronous generator (DDPMSG). LCA reveals that environmental impacts are concentrated during manufacturing of fundament, tower and nacelle, which account for up to 19%, 30% and 99% of single impacts, respectively. Main drivers are the use of copper, steel and in case of DDPMSG also the rare earth permanent magnets. The DDSG shows higher impacts than the other wind turbines in 14 out of all 15 categories, due to the higher weight of its nacelle. Impacts due to operation add up to 3%.Four sensitivity analyses are conducted to estimate the effects of component replacement, recycling, origin of rare earths for permanent magnet production for DDPMSG and electricity yield. Possible recycling options show the highest improvement potential and even change turbine types ranking. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153 |c POF3-153 |f POF III |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Marx, Josefine |0 P:(DE-Juel1)130473 |b 1 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Zapp, Petra |0 P:(DE-Juel1)130493 |b 2 |u fzj |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.058 |g Vol. 233, p. 561 - 572 |0 PERI:(DE-600)2029338-0 |p 561 - 572 |t Journal of cleaner production |v 233 |y 2019 |x 0959-6526 |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:863775 |p VDB |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 0 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)130483 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 1 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)130473 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 2 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)130493 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |l Technologie, Innovation und Gesellschaft |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-150 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100 |v Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |b Energie |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2019 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Nationallizenz |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b J CLEAN PROD : 2017 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF >= 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905 |2 StatID |b J CLEAN PROD : 2017 |
| 920 | _ | _ | |l yes |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013 |k IEK-STE |l Systemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|