Home > Publications database > Response to ‘Life-cycle green-house gas emissions of onshore and offshore wind turbines’ > print

001     863776
005     20210130002321.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.090
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0959-6526
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1879-1786
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000463122100004
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2019-03772
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 330
100 1 _ |a Marx, Josefine
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130473
|b 0
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Response to ‘Life-cycle green-house gas emissions of onshore and offshore wind turbines’
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2019
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1563367254_4229
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a In this letter, we respond to the article by Wang et al., (2019) in this journal, Volume 210, which estimates the life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of onshore and offshore wind turbines with the nominal capacity of 2 MW. The results show GHG emissions of 33278.19 t CO2-eq for onshore and 75904.84 t CO2-eq for offshore turbines for a 20-year lifetime. The results suggest that ‘transport and installation’ contributes most to the life-cycle GHG emissions (>90%). This is contrary to many other LCA studies concerning wind power. We think that several serious mistakes have been made in the study, leading to completely wrong conclusions of the authors. We would like to clarify some of the results.
536 _ _ |a 153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153
|c POF3-153
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Schreiber, Andrea
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130483
|b 1
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Zapp, Petra
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130493
|b 2
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.090
|g Vol. 219, p. 33 - 34
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2029338-0
|p 33 - 34
|t Journal of cleaner production
|v 219
|y 2019
|x 0959-6526
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:863776
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130473
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130483
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130493
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Technologie, Innovation und Gesellschaft
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-150
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|v Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Energie
914 1 _ |y 2019
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J CLEAN PROD : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b J CLEAN PROD : 2017
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
|k IEK-STE
|l Systemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21