% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Jesse:863780,
      author       = {Jesse, Bernhard-Johannes and Heinrichs, Heidi Ursula and
                      Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm},
      title        = {{A}dapting the theory of resilience to energy systems: {A}
                      review and outlook},
      journal      = {Energy, Sustainability and Society},
      volume       = {9},
      number       = {1},
      issn         = {2192-0567},
      address      = {Heidelberg},
      publisher    = {Springer},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2019-03773},
      pages        = {27},
      year         = {2019},
      abstract     = {Sustainable systems must maintain their function even in
                      the event of disruptions in order to be considered truly
                      sustainable. The theory of resilience concerns the behavior
                      of systems during and aftershocks. Initially, modern
                      understanding of resilience focused on ecological systems;
                      however, the theory was extended to include the ecological
                      aspects and the also social aspects of a system. As a result
                      of climate change, increased efforts have been made to
                      ensure energy systems are more sustainable. The issue of
                      resilience has therefore significantly gained importance of
                      late to energy systems. In the future, modern energy systems
                      will be increasingly exposed to disruptions, whether due to
                      climate change, terrorism, or variable power supply from
                      renewable energy sources. Protecting energy systems from all
                      these threats is only possible at great cost, but it is much
                      more sensible to design resilient systems that can quickly
                      resume their system function after a disturbance. This
                      review looks at research into the resilience and its
                      application to energy systems and identifies similarities
                      and differences. Starting with Holling’s contribution to
                      resilience, the development of the theory is examined and
                      the different definitions are compared. The differences
                      between engineering and ecological resilience are also
                      discussed. Additionally, the review examines, on the one
                      hand, criticism of the theory of resilience and, on the
                      other hand, remaining questions in relation to the
                      application of resilience, such as the system’s state
                      after the disruption. The paper subsequently examines the
                      application of the theory of resilience to different energy
                      systems. The review concludes with an outlook on the
                      possibility of operationalizing resilience for energy
                      systems.},
      cin          = {IEK-STE / IEK-3},
      ddc          = {333.7},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013 / I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013},
      pnm          = {153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of
                      Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000475646600001},
      doi          = {10.1186/s13705-019-0210-7},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/863780},
}