% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Kebir:863990,
author = {Kebir, Sied and Schaub, Christina and Junold, Nina and
Hattingen, Elke and Schäfer, Niklas and Steinbach, Joachim
P. and Weyerbrock, Astrid and Hau, Peter and Goldbrunner,
Roland and Galldiks, Norbert and Weller, Johannes and Mack,
Frederic and Tzaridis, Theophilos and Bähr, Oliver and
Seidel, Clemens and Schlegel, Uwe and Schmidt-Graf,
Friederike and Rohde, Veit and Borchers, Christian and
Tabatabai, Ghazaleh and Hänel, Mathias and Sabel, Michael
and Gerlach, Rüdiger and Krex, Dietmar and Belka, Claus and
Vatter, Hartmut and Proescholdt, Martin and Glas, Martin and
Herrlinger, Ulrich},
title = {{B}aseline {T}1 hyperintense and diffusion-restricted
lesions are not linked to prolonged survival in
bevacizumab-treated glioblastoma patients of the {GLARIUS}
trial},
journal = {Journal of neuro-oncology},
volume = {144},
number = {3},
issn = {1573-7373},
address = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
publisher = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V},
reportid = {FZJ-2019-03906},
pages = {501-509},
year = {2019},
abstract = {PurposeThe phase II GLARIUS trial assigned patients with
newly diagnosed, O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase
promoter non-methylated glioblastoma to experimental
bevacizumab/irinotecan (BEV/IRI) or standard temozolomide
(TMZ). To identify subpopulations with a particularly
favorable course, we assessed the prognostic potential of
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers before treatment
onset.MethodsMRIs at baseline (before treatment onset) were
analyzed for T1-hyperintense and diffusion-restricted
lesions; as well as the presence of both hyperintense and
diffusion-restricted (double positive) lesions. The MRI
findings were correlated with overall and progression-free
survival.ResultsMRI scans were evaluable in $71\%$ of the
GLARIUS modified intention-to-treat population (n = 121
of 170; 88 patients in the BEV/IRI arm, and 33 patients in
the TMZ control arm). Diffusion-restricted and T1
hyperintense lesions were present in $60\%$ and $65\%$ of
patients in BEV/IRI arm, while $57\%$ and $63\%$ were found
in the TMZ arm, respectively. Double positive lesions were
found in $37\%$ of BEV/IRI patients and in $39\%$ of TMZ
patients. Neither the presence of T1-hyperintense,
diffusion-restricted lesions, nor double positive lesions
were associated with improved survival.ConclusionsBaseline
T1-hyperintense and diffusion-restricted lesions are not
suitable to predict progression-free or overall survival of
patients treated with bevacizumab/irinotecan or
temozolomide.},
cin = {INM-3},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
pnm = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:31325144},
UT = {WOS:000487899900008},
doi = {10.1007/s11060-019-03246-4},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/863990},
}