000864046 001__ 864046
000864046 005__ 20210130002415.0
000864046 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1111/1365-2435.13231
000864046 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0269-8463
000864046 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1365-2435
000864046 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:50124210
000864046 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000458830500007
000864046 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/25084
000864046 037__ $$aFZJ-2019-03961
000864046 041__ $$aEnglish
000864046 082__ $$a570
000864046 1001_ $$00000-0002-3227-0289$$aMartín‐Robles, Nieves$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000864046 245__ $$aRoot traits of herbaceous crops: Pre‐adaptation to cultivation or evolution under domestication?
000864046 260__ $$aOxford [u.a.]$$bWiley-Blackwell$$c2019
000864046 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000864046 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000864046 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1565945317_21824
000864046 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000864046 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000864046 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000864046 520__ $$aAgricultural fields are commonly characterized by high nutrient and water availabilities, which are favourable for plant growth. Such conditions might promote the evolution of resource‐acquisitive strategies. We asked whether crop plants show root traits typical of resource‐acquisitive strategies and whether this strategy is primarily a result of their evolution under domestication or of the early selection of successful candidates for domestication.We studied a set of 30 crop species and their wild progenitors. We set up a greenhouse experiment to measure five root traits: root thickness, root tissue density, specific root length (SRL), root mass fraction (RMF) and root length ratio. In addition, we compiled data from other wild herbaceous species, growth in similar conditions to this experiment, to place the root traits of our crops in the context of wider botanical variation.Wild progenitors had thicker and less dense roots, with higher RMF and lower SRL, than other wild herbs. Thicker and less dense roots are indicative of fertile soils, which suggest that wild progenitors could have been adapted for success in agricultural conditions. Additionally, we found that domestication generally increased total plant dry mass, but none of the root traits evolved consistently towards a more resource‐acquisitive strategy after domestication across all species. Root trait values differed between progenitors and crop species for most pairs surveyed, but this occurred in diverse directions depending on crop species. Such differences were independent of phylogeny, functional group or variability in the domestication processes, such as timing of the domestication event or organ under focal artificial selection.Our comparative study revealed that the root phenotype exhibited by wild progenitors (thick roots with low density and SRL), when compared with other wild herbs, was in accordance with plants typical of fertile habitats. However, none of the root traits reacted to domestication in accordance with evolution towards faster growth strategies. Thus, the adaptation of crop root phenotypes to the fertile conditions of agricultural fields might be largely determined by early choices of wild species, rather than by further evolution under domestication
000864046 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582$$a582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)$$cPOF3-582$$fPOF III$$x0
000864046 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000864046 7001_ $$00000-0001-9141-8581$$aMorente‐López, Javier$$b1
000864046 7001_ $$00000-0002-8830-3860$$aFreschet, Grégoire T.$$b2
000864046 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129384$$aPoorter, Hendrik$$b3$$ufzj
000864046 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRoumet, Catherine$$b4
000864046 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMilla, Rubén$$b5
000864046 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2020307-X$$a10.1111/1365-2435.13231$$gVol. 33, no. 2, p. 273 - 285$$n2$$p273 - 285$$tFunctional ecology$$v33$$x1365-2435$$y2019
000864046 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864046/files/Mart-n-Robles_et_al-2019-Functional_Ecology.pdf$$yRestricted
000864046 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864046/files/Mart-n-Robles_et_al-2019-Functional_Ecology.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000864046 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864046/files/Martin-Roblesetal.2018-Roottraitsofherbaceouscropspreadaptationtocultivationorevolutionunderdomestication.pdf$$yPublished on 2018-10-17. Available in OpenAccess from 2019-10-17.
000864046 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864046/files/Martin-Roblesetal.2018-Roottraitsofherbaceouscropspreadaptationtocultivationorevolutionunderdomestication.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yPublished on 2018-10-17. Available in OpenAccess from 2019-10-17.
000864046 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:864046$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000864046 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129384$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000864046 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lKey Technologies for the Bioeconomy$$vPlant Science$$x0
000864046 9141_ $$y2019
000864046 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000864046 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000864046 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000864046 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1040$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bZoological Record
000864046 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0530$$2StatID$$aEmbargoed OpenAccess
000864046 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bFUNCT ECOL : 2017
000864046 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bFUNCT ECOL : 2017
000864046 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000864046 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000864046 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000864046 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000864046 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000864046 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000864046 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0430$$2StatID$$aNational-Konsortium
000864046 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000864046 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000864046 920__ $$lno
000864046 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118$$kIBG-2$$lPflanzenwissenschaften$$x0
000864046 980__ $$ajournal
000864046 980__ $$aVDB
000864046 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000864046 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000864046 9801_ $$aFullTexts