% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Poorter:864047,
      author       = {Poorter, Hendrik and Niinemets, Ülo and Ntagkas, Nikolaos
                      and Siebenkäs, Alrun and Mäenpää, Maarit and Matsubara,
                      Shizue and Pons, ThijsL.},
      title        = {{A} meta‐analysis of plant responses to light intensity
                      for 70 traits ranging from molecules to whole plant
                      performance},
      journal      = {The new phytologist},
      volume       = {223},
      number       = {3},
      issn         = {1469-8137},
      address      = {Oxford [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Wiley-Blackwell},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2019-03962},
      pages        = {1073-1105},
      year         = {2019},
      abstract     = {By means of meta‐analyses we determined how 70 traits
                      related to plant anatomy, morphology, chemistry, physiology,
                      growth and reproduction are affected by daily light integral
                      (DLI; mol photons m−2 d−1). A large database including
                      500 experiments with 760 plant species enabled us to
                      determine generalized dose–response curves. Many traits
                      increase with DLI in a saturating fashion. Some showed a
                      more than 10‐fold increase over the DLI range of 1–50
                      mol m−2 d−1, such as the number of seeds produced per
                      plant and the actual rate of photosynthesis. Strong
                      decreases with DLI (up to three‐fold) were observed for
                      leaf area ratio and leaf payback time. Plasticity
                      differences among species groups were generally small
                      compared with the overall responses to DLI. However, for a
                      number of traits, including photosynthetic capacity and
                      realized growth, we found woody and shade‐tolerant species
                      to have lower plasticity. We further conclude that the
                      direction and degree of trait changes adheres with responses
                      to plant density and to vertical light gradients within
                      plant canopies. This synthesis provides a strong
                      quantitative basis for understanding plant acclimation to
                      light, from molecular to whole plant responses, but also
                      identifies the variables that currently form weak spots in
                      our knowledge, such as respiration and reproductive
                      characteristics.},
      cin          = {IBG-2},
      ddc          = {580},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
      pnm          = {582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:30802971},
      UT           = {WOS:000475918000007},
      doi          = {10.1111/nph.15754},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864047},
}