001     864173
005     20240313103134.0
024 7 _ |a 10.3934/mbe.2019351
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/23040
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000487331700043
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a pmid:31698600
|2 pmid
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2019-04039
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 510
100 1 _ |a Ito, Junji
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)144576
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
111 2 _ |a Neural Coding 2018
|c Turin
|d 2018-09-09 - 2018-09-14
|w Italy
245 _ _ |a Detection and evaluation of bursts in terms of novelty and surprise
260 _ _ |a Springfield, Mo.
|c 2019
|b Inst.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1569913690_16323
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The detection of bursts and also of response onsets is often of relevance in understanding neurophysiological data, but the detection of these events is not a trivial task. We build on a method that was originally designed for burst detection using the so-called burst surprise as a measure. We extend this method and provide a proper significance measure. Our method consists of two stages. In the first stage we model the neuron’s interspike interval (ISI) distribution and make an i.i.d. assumption to formulate our null hypothesis. In addition we define a set of ’surprising’ events that signify deviations from the null hypothesis in the direction of ’burstiness’. Here the so-called (strict) burst novelty is used to measure the size of this deviation. In the second stage we determine the significance of this deviation. The (strict) burst surprise is used to measure the significance, since it is the negative logarithm of the significance probability. After showing the consequences of a non-proper null hypothesis on burst detection performance, we apply the method to experimental data. For this application the data are divided into a period for parameter estimation to express a proper null hypothesis (model of the ISI distribution), and the rest of the data is analyzed by using that null hypothesis. We find that assuming a Poisson process for experimental spike data from motor cortex is rarely a proper null hypothesis, because these data tend to fire more regularly and thus a gamma process is more appropriate. We show that our burst detection method can be used for rate change onset detection, because a deviation from the null hypothesis detected by (strict) burst novelty also covers an increase of firing rate.
536 _ _ |a 89571 - Connectivity and Activity (POF2-89571)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89571
|c POF2-89571
|x 0
|f POF II T
536 _ _ |a HBP SGA2 - Human Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement 2 (785907)
|0 G:(EU-Grant)785907
|c 785907
|x 1
|f H2020-SGA-FETFLAG-HBP-2017
536 _ _ |a DFG project 238707842 - Kausative Mechanismen mesoskopischer Aktivitätsmuster in der auditorischen Kategorien-Diskrimination (238707842)
|0 G:(GEPRIS)238707842
|c 238707842
|x 2
536 _ _ |a GRK 2416 - GRK 2416: MultiSenses-MultiScales: Neue Ansätze zur Aufklärung neuronaler multisensorischer Integration (368482240)
|0 G:(GEPRIS)368482240
|c 368482240
|x 3
536 _ _ |a DFG project 238707842 - Kausative Mechanismen mesoskopischer Aktivitätsmuster in der auditorischen Kategorien-Diskrimination (238707842)
|0 G:(GEPRIS)238707842
|c 238707842
|x 4
700 1 _ |a Lucrezia, Emanuele
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)169779
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Palm, Günther
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)172768
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Grün, Sonja
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)144168
|b 3
|u fzj
770 _ _ |a Neural Coding 2018
773 _ _ |a 10.3934/mbe.2019351
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2265126-3
|n 6
|p 6990-7008
|t Mathematical biosciences and engineering
|v 16
|y 2019
|x 1547-1063
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864173/files/Invoice_APC_MBE2019223.pdf
856 4 _ |x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864173/files/Invoice_APC_MBE2019223.pdf?subformat=pdfa
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864173/files/mbe-16-06-351.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864173/files/mbe-16-06-351.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:864173
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p ec_fundedresources
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)144576
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)172768
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)144168
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89571
|v Connectivity and Activity
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800
|b Programmungebundene Forschung
|l ohne Programm
914 1 _ |y 2019
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b MATH BIOSCI ENG : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113
|k INM-10
|l Jara-Institut Brain structure-function relationships
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-6-20090406
|k INM-6
|l Computational and Systems Neuroscience
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828
|k IAS-6
|l Theoretical Neuroscience
|x 2
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-6-20090406
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828
980 _ _ |a APC
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21