001     864235
005     20240711113851.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1088/1741-4326/ab0c47
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0029-5515
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1741-4326
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a altmetric:58917519
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a WOS:000464453100002
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2019-04069
082 _ _ |a 620
100 1 _ |a Telesca, G.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130165
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a COREDIV numerical simulation of high neutron rate JET-ILW DD pulses in view of extension to JET-ILW DT experiments
260 _ _ |a Vienna
|c 2019
|b IAEA
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1565250306_23602
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Two high performance JET-ILW pulses, pertaining to the 2016 experimental campaign, have been numerically simulated with the self-consistent code COREDIV with the aim of predicting the ELM-averaged power load to the target when extrapolated to DT plasmas. The input power of about 33 MW as well as the total radiated power and the average density are similar in the two pulses, but for one of them the density is provided by combined low gas puff and pellet injection, characterized by low SOL density, for the other one by gas fuelling only, at higher SOL density. Considering the magnetic configuration of theses pulses and the presence of a significant amount of Ni (not included in the version of the code used for these simulations), a number of assumptions are made in order to reproduce numerically the main core and SOL experimental data. The extrapolation to DT plasmas at the original input power of 33 MW, and taking into account only the thermal component of the alpha-power, does not show any significant difference regarding the power to the target with respect to the DD case. In contrast, the simulations at auxiliary power 40 MW, both at the original I p  =  3 MA and at I p  =  4 MA, show that the power to the target for both pulses is possibly too high to be sustained for about 5 s by strike-point sweeping alone without any control by Ne seeding. Even though the target power load may decrease to about 13–15 MW with substantial Ne seeding for both pulses, as from numerical predictions, there are indications suggesting that the control of the power load may be more critical for the pulse with pellet injection, due to the reduced SOL radiation.
536 _ _ |a 174 - Plasma-Wall-Interaction (POF3-174)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-174
|c POF3-174
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Ivanova-Stanik, I.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Zagórski, R.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Brezinsek, S.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129976
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Carvalho, P. J.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Czarnecka, A.
|0 0000-0003-4931-728X
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Giroud, C.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Huber, A.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)173012
|b 7
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Lerche, E.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Wiesen, S.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)5247
|b 9
773 _ _ |a 10.1088/1741-4326/ab0c47
|g Vol. 59, no. 5, p. 056026 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2037980-8
|n 5
|p 056026 -
|t Nuclear fusion
|v 59
|y 2019
|x 1741-4326
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864235/files/Telesca_2019_Nucl._Fusion_59_056026-1.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864235/files/Telesca_2019_Nucl._Fusion_59_056026-1.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:864235
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130165
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129976
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)173012
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 9
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)5247
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Kernfusion
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-170
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-174
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|v Plasma-Wall-Interaction
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Energie
914 1 _ |y 2019
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a National-Konsortium
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0430
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b NUCL FUSION : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013
|k IEK-4
|l Plasmaphysik
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IFN-1-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21