001     864317
005     20220930130216.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1371/journal.pone.0220767
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/22569
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a pmid:31386699
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000484997100036
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:64836893
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2019-04124
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Daun, Silvia
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)162297
|b 0
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Unravelling intra- and intersegmental neuronal connectivity between central pattern generating networks in a multi-legged locomotor system
260 _ _ |a San Francisco, California, US
|c 2019
|b PLOS
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1567581938_12180
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Animal walking results from a complex interplay of central pattern generating networks (CPGs), local sensory signals expressing position, velocity and forces generated in the legs, and coordinating signals between neighboring legs. In particular, the CPGs control the activity of motoneuron (MN) pools which drive the muscles of the individual legs and are thereby responsible for the generation of rhythmic leg movements. The rhythmic activity of the CPGs as well as their connectivity can be modified by the aforementioned sensory signals. However, the precise nature of the interaction between the CPGs and these sensory signals has remained generally largely unknown. Experimental methods aiming at finding out details of these interactions often apply cholinergic agonists such as pilocarpine in order to induce rhythmic activity in the CPGs. Using this general approach, we removed the influence of sensory signals and investigated the putative connections between CPGs controlling the upward/downward movement in the different legs of the stick insect. The experimental data, i.e. the measured MN activities, underwent connectivity analysis using Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM). This method can uncover the underlying coupling structure and strength between pairs of segmental CPGs. For the analysis we set up different coupling schemes (models) for DCM and compared them using Bayesian Model Selection (BMS). Models with contralateral connections in each segment and ipsilateral connections on both sides, as well as the coupling from the meta- to the ipsilateral prothoracic ganglion were preferred by BMS to all other types of models tested. Moreover, the intrasegmental coupling strength in the mesothoracic ganglion was the strongest and most stable in all three ganglia.
536 _ _ |a 572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|c POF3-572
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Mantziaris, Charalampos
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Tóth, Tibor
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Büschges, Ansgar
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Rosjat, Nils
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)164124
|b 4
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1371/journal.pone.0220767
|g Vol. 14, no. 8, p. e0220767 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2267670-3
|n 8
|p e0220767 -
|t PLOS ONE
|v 14
|y 2019
|x 1932-6203
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864317/files/Customer%20Statement%20-%20Detail_July.pdf
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864317/files/Daun_2019_Plos%20One_Unravelling%20intra-%20and%20intersegmental%20neuronal%20connectivity%20between%20central%20pattern%20generating%20networks%20in%20a%20multi_legged%20locomotor%20system.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864317/files/Daun_2019_Plos%20One_Unravelling%20intra-%20and%20intersegmental%20neuronal%20connectivity%20between%20central%20pattern%20generating%20networks%20in%20a%20multi_legged%20locomotor%20system.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864317/files/Customer%20Statement%20-%20Detail_July.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:864317
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)162297
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)164124
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v (Dys-)function and Plasticity
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2019
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1040
|2 StatID
|b Zoological Record
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b PLOS ONE : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
|k INM-3
|l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
980 _ _ |a APC
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21