000864338 001__ 864338
000864338 005__ 20210130002519.0
000864338 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1002/jpln.201700393
000864338 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0044-3263
000864338 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0366-2136
000864338 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0372-9702
000864338 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0932-6987
000864338 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0932-6995
000864338 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1436-8730
000864338 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1522-2624
000864338 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000458701100005
000864338 037__ $$aFZJ-2019-04134
000864338 082__ $$a640
000864338 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aCiganda, Verónica S.$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000864338 245__ $$aSoil nitrous oxide emissions from grassland: Potential inhibitor effect of hippuric acid
000864338 260__ $$aWeinheim$$bWiley-VCH$$c2019
000864338 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000864338 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000864338 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1565338638_28464
000864338 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000864338 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000864338 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000864338 520__ $$aIn grassland systems, cattle and sheep urine patches are recognized as nitrous oxide (N2O) emission hot spots due to the high urinary nitrogen (N) concentrations. Hippuric acid (HA) is one of the constituents of ruminant urine that has been reported as a natural inhibitor of soil N2O emissions. The aim of this study was to examine the potential for elevated ruminant urine HA concentrations to reduce N2O emissions, in situ, on an acidic heavy clay soil under poorly drained conditions (WFPS > 85%). A randomized complete block design experiment with three replications and four treatments was conducted using the closed‐static‐flux chamber methodology. The four treatments were applied inside the chambers: control with no artificial urine application (C), control artificial urine (U), and enriched artificial urine with two rates of HA (55.8 and 90 mM, U+HA1, U+HA2). Soil inorganic‐N, soil dissolved organic carbon (DOC), soil pH as well as N2O and methane (CH4) fluxes were monitored over a 79‐d period. Although N2O emissions were not affected by the HA enriched urine treatments, U+HA2 positively affected the retention of N as urn:x-wiley:14368730:media:jpln201700393-math-0001 until day 3, when the soil pH dropped to values < 5. Subsequently, as a consequence of rainfall events and soil acidification, it is likely that leaching or sorption onto clay reduced the efficacy of HA, masking any treatment differential effect on N2O emissions. Moreover, CH4 fluxes as well as DOC results reflected the soil anaerobic conditions which did not favour nitrification processes. Further research is needed to determine the fate of HA into the soil which might clarify the lack of an in situ effect of this compound.
000864338 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000864338 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000864338 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLópez-Aizpún, María$$b1
000864338 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRepullo, Miguel A.$$b2
000864338 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWu, Di$$b3
000864338 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aTerra, José A.$$b4
000864338 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aElustondo, David$$b5
000864338 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aClough, Tim$$b6
000864338 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aCardenas, Laura M.$$b7
000864338 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1481142-x$$a10.1002/jpln.201700393$$gVol. 182, no. 1, p. 40 - 47$$n1$$p40 - 47$$tJournal of plant nutrition and soil science$$v182$$x1436-8730$$y2019
000864338 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864338/files/jpln.201700393.pdf$$yRestricted
000864338 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864338/files/jpln.201700393.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000864338 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:864338$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pVDB
000864338 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-HGF)0$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000864338 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000864338 9141_ $$y2019
000864338 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000864338 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000864338 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bJ PLANT NUTR SOIL SC : 2017
000864338 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000864338 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000864338 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000864338 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000864338 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000864338 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000864338 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000864338 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000864338 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000864338 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000864338 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000864338 920__ $$lyes
000864338 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000864338 980__ $$ajournal
000864338 980__ $$aVDB
000864338 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000864338 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED