% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Sulis:864351,
author = {Sulis, Mauro and Couvreur, Valentin and Keune, Jessica and
Cai, Gaochao and Trebs, Ivonne and Junk, Juergen and
Shrestha, Prabhakar and Simmer, Clemens and Kollet, Stefan
J. and Vereecken, Harry and Vanderborght, Jan},
title = {{I}ncorporating a root water uptake model based on the
hydraulic architecture approach in terrestrial systems
simulations},
journal = {Agricultural and forest meteorology},
volume = {269-270},
issn = {0168-1923},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {FZJ-2019-04147},
pages = {28 - 45},
year = {2019},
abstract = {A detailed representation of plant hydraulic traits and
stomatal closure in land surface models (LSMs) is a
prerequisite for improved predictions of ecosystem drought
response. This work presents the integration of a
macroscopic root water uptake (RWU) model based on the
hydraulic architecture approach in the LSM of the
Terrestrial Systems Modeling Platform. The novel RWU
approach is based on three parameters derived from first
principles that describe the root system equivalent
conductance, the compensatory RWU conductance, and the leaf
water potential at stomatal closure, which defines the water
stress condition for the plants. The developed RWU model
intrinsically accounts for changes in the root density as
well as for the simulation of the hydraulic lift process.
The standard and the new RWU approach are compared by
performing point-scale simulations for cropland over a
sheltered minirhizotron facility in Selhausen, Germany, and
validated against transpiration fluxes estimated from sap
flow and soil water content measurements at different
depths. Numerical sensitivity experiments are carried out
using different soil textures and root distributions in
order to evaluate the interplay between soil hydrodynamics
and plant characteristics, and the impact of assuming
time-constant plant physiological properties. Results show a
good agreement between simulated and observed transpiration
fluxes for both RWU models, with a more distinct response
under water stress conditions and with uncertainty in the
soil parameterization prevailing to the differences due to
changes in the model formulation. The hydraulic RWU model
exhibits also a lower sensitivity to the root distributions
when simulating the onset of the water stress period.
Finally, an analysis of variability across the soil and root
scenarios indicates that differences in soil water content
are mainly influenced by the root distribution, while the
transpiration flux in both RWU models is additionally
determined by the soil characteristics.},
cin = {IBG-3 / NIC},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 / I:(DE-Juel1)NIC-20090406},
pnm = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255) / Terrestrial Systems Modeling – Validation
with Polarimetric Radar Retrievals and Data Assimilation
$(hbn33_20180501)$ / Terrestrial Systems Modeling –
Validation with Polarimetric Radar Retrievals and Data
Assimilation $(hbn33_20190501)$},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 / $G:(DE-Juel1)hbn33_20180501$ /
$G:(DE-Juel1)hbn33_20190501$},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000463120900004},
doi = {10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.01.034},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864351},
}