% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{CastellanoHinojosa:864357,
author = {Castellano-Hinojosa, Antonio and Loick, Nadine and Dixon,
Elizabeth and Matthews, G. Peter and Lewicka-Szczebak,
Dominika and Well, Reinhard and Bol, Roland and Charteris,
Alice and Cardenas, Laura},
title = {{I}mproved isotopic model based on 15 {N} tracing and
{R}ayleigh-type isotope fractionation for simulating
differential sources of {N} 2 {O} emissions in a clay
grassland soil},
journal = {Rapid communications in mass spectrometry},
volume = {33},
number = {5},
issn = {0951-4198},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {Wiley Interscience},
reportid = {FZJ-2019-04153},
pages = {449 - 460},
year = {2019},
abstract = {RationaleIsotopic signatures of N2O can help distinguish
between two sources (fertiliser N or endogenous soil N) of
N2O emissions. The contribution of each source to N2O
emissions after N‐application is difficult to determine.
Here, isotopologue signatures of emitted N2O are used in an
improved isotopic model based on Rayleigh‐type
equations.MethodsThe effects of a partial $(33\%$ of surface
area, treatment 1c) or total $(100\%$ of surface area,
treatment 3c) dispersal of N and C on gaseous emissions from
denitrification were measured in a laboratory incubation
system (DENIS) allowing simultaneous measurements of NO,
N2O, N2 and CO2 over a 12‐day incubation period. To
determine the source of N2O emissions those results were
combined with both the isotope ratio mass spectrometry
analysis of the isotopocules of emitted N2O and those from
the 15N‐tracing technique.ResultsThe spatial dispersal of
N and C significantly affected the quantity, but not the
timing, of gas fluxes. Cumulative emissions are larger for
treatment 3c than treatment 1c. The 15N‐enrichment
analysis shows that initially $~70\%$ of the emitted N2O
derived from the applied amendment followed by a constant
decrease. The decrease in contribution of the fertiliser
N‐pool after an initial increase is sooner and larger for
treatment 1c. The Rayleigh‐type model applied to N2O
isotopocules data (δ15Nbulk‐N2O values) shows poor
agreement with the measurements for the original one‐pool
model for treatment 1c; the two‐pool models gives better
results when using a third‐order polynomial equation. In
contrast, in treatment 3c little difference is observed
between the two modelling approaches.ConclusionsThe
importance of N2O emissions from different N‐pools in soil
for the interpretation of N2O isotopocules data was
demonstrated using a Rayleigh‐type model. Earlier
statements concerning exponential increase in native soil
nitrate pool activity highlighted in previous studies should
be replaced with a polynomial increase with dependency on
both N‐pool sizes.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:30561863},
UT = {WOS:000459797600007},
doi = {10.1002/rcm.8374},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864357},
}