001     864357
005     20210130002529.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1002/rcm.8374
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0951-4198
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1097-0231
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/22581
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:52862751
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:30561863
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000459797600007
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2019-04153
082 _ _ |a 530
100 1 _ |a Castellano-Hinojosa, Antonio
|0 0000-0002-5785-7625
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Improved isotopic model based on 15 N tracing and Rayleigh-type isotope fractionation for simulating differential sources of N 2 O emissions in a clay grassland soil
260 _ _ |a New York, NY
|c 2019
|b Wiley Interscience
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1565341772_28465
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a RationaleIsotopic signatures of N2O can help distinguish between two sources (fertiliser N or endogenous soil N) of N2O emissions. The contribution of each source to N2O emissions after N‐application is difficult to determine. Here, isotopologue signatures of emitted N2O are used in an improved isotopic model based on Rayleigh‐type equations.MethodsThe effects of a partial (33% of surface area, treatment 1c) or total (100% of surface area, treatment 3c) dispersal of N and C on gaseous emissions from denitrification were measured in a laboratory incubation system (DENIS) allowing simultaneous measurements of NO, N2O, N2 and CO2 over a 12‐day incubation period. To determine the source of N2O emissions those results were combined with both the isotope ratio mass spectrometry analysis of the isotopocules of emitted N2O and those from the 15N‐tracing technique.ResultsThe spatial dispersal of N and C significantly affected the quantity, but not the timing, of gas fluxes. Cumulative emissions are larger for treatment 3c than treatment 1c. The 15N‐enrichment analysis shows that initially ~70% of the emitted N2O derived from the applied amendment followed by a constant decrease. The decrease in contribution of the fertiliser N‐pool after an initial increase is sooner and larger for treatment 1c. The Rayleigh‐type model applied to N2O isotopocules data (δ15Nbulk‐N2O values) shows poor agreement with the measurements for the original one‐pool model for treatment 1c; the two‐pool models gives better results when using a third‐order polynomial equation. In contrast, in treatment 3c little difference is observed between the two modelling approaches.ConclusionsThe importance of N2O emissions from different N‐pools in soil for the interpretation of N2O isotopocules data was demonstrated using a Rayleigh‐type model. Earlier statements concerning exponential increase in native soil nitrate pool activity highlighted in previous studies should be replaced with a polynomial increase with dependency on both N‐pool sizes.
536 _ _ |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|c POF3-255
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Loick, Nadine
|0 0000-0001-5316-5552
|b 1
|e Corresponding author
700 1 _ |a Dixon, Elizabeth
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Matthews, G. Peter
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Lewicka-Szczebak, Dominika
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Well, Reinhard
|0 0000-0003-4746-4972
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Bol, Roland
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)145865
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Charteris, Alice
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Cardenas, Laura
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
773 _ _ |a 10.1002/rcm.8374
|g Vol. 33, no. 5, p. 449 - 460
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2002158-6
|n 5
|p 449 - 460
|t Rapid communications in mass spectrometry
|v 33
|y 2019
|x 0951-4198
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864357/files/Castellano-Hinojosa_et_al-2019-Rapid_Communications_in_Mass_Spectrometry.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864357/files/Castellano-Hinojosa_et_al-2019-Rapid_Communications_in_Mass_Spectrometry.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:864357
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)145865
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Erde und Umwelt
914 1 _ |y 2019
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b RAPID COMMUN MASS SP : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21