Home > Publications database > Social LCA for rare earth NdFeB permanent magnets > print

001     864593
005     20210130002627.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.spc.2019.07.006
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a WOS:000483411500022
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2019-04304
082 _ _ |a 333.7
100 1 _ |a Werker, Jasmin
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)172948
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Social LCA for rare earth NdFeB permanent magnets
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2019
|b Elsevier
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1568271252_2892
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Rare earth permanent magnets are important components for modern (energy) technologies and are employed to reduce GHG emissions and combat climate change. The process of extracting these minerals from the ore has contentious economic, environmental and social implications. While the environmental impacts of their production have already been analyzed in several studies, the economic and the social perspective is still under-researched. The Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) approach employed in the present research explores whether there is a difference in social risks for rare earth permanent magnet production from three different rare earth ore production locations and the associated value chains. While one is located completely in China, another is composed of processes in Australia and Malaysia. The third process chain combines processes in the United States and Japan. The Product Social Impact Life Cycle Assessment (PSILCA) 2.0 database is used to assess the social implications. The analysis focuses on value chain actors, a stakeholder group of great interest to businesses but often underrepresented in S-LCA research. The impact categories describing this stakeholder group pertain to issues of social responsibility along the value chain, fair competition and corruption. Overall, the US value chain indicates the lowest level of social risk along the supply chain. However, in order to gain a deeper understanding of the social risks a sectoral and geographical analysis is conducted. Across all three cases, the mineral, fossil fuel and chemical sectors are shown to be problematic.
536 _ _ |a 153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153
|c POF3-153
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Wulf, Christina
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)168163
|b 1
|e Corresponding author
700 1 _ |a Zapp, Petra
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130493
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Schreiber, Andrea
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130483
|b 3
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Marx, Josefine
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130473
|b 4
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.spc.2019.07.006
|g Vol. 19, p. 257 - 269
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2830683-1
|p 257 - 269
|t Sustainable production and consumption
|v 19
|y 2019
|x 2352-5509
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:864593
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)168163
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130493
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130483
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130473
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Technologie, Innovation und Gesellschaft
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-150
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|v Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Energie
914 1 _ |y 2019
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
|k IEK-STE
|l Systemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21