% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Jording:864618,
author = {Jording, M. and Hartz, A. and Bente, G. and
Schulte-Rüther, M. and Vogeley, K.},
title = {{I}nferring interactivity from gaze patterns during triadic
person-object-agent interactions},
journal = {Frontiers in psychology},
volume = {10},
issn = {1664-1078},
address = {Lausanne},
publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
reportid = {FZJ-2019-04323},
pages = {1913},
year = {2019},
abstract = {Observing others’ gaze informs us about relevant matters
in the environment. Humans’ sensitivity to gaze cues and
our ability to use this information to focus our own
attention is crucial to learning, social coordination, and
survival. Gaze can also be a deliberate social signal which
captures and directs the gaze of others toward an object of
interest. In the current study, we investigated whether the
intention to actively communicate one’s own attentional
focus can be inferred from the dynamics of gaze alone. We
used a triadic gaze interaction paradigm based on the
recently proposed classification of attentional states and
respective gaze patterns in person-object-person
interactions, the so-called “social gaze space (SGS).”
Twenty-eight participants interacted with a computer
controlled virtual agent while they assumed to interact with
a real human. During the experiment, the virtual agent
engaged in various gaze patterns which were determined by
the agent’s attentional communicative state, as described
by the concept of SGS. After each interaction, participants
were asked to judge whether the other person was trying to
deliberately interact with them. Results show that
participants were able to infer the communicative intention
solely from the agent’s gaze behavior. The results
substantiate claims about the pivotal role of gaze in social
coordination and relationship formation. Our results further
reveal that social expectations are reflected in
differential responses to the displayed gaze patterns and
may be crucial for impression formation during gaze-based
interaction. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first
study to document the experience of interactivity in
continuous and contingent triadic gaze interactions.},
cin = {INM-3 / INM-11},
ddc = {150},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-11-20170113},
pnm = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:31496976},
UT = {WOS:000482079500002},
doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01913},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864618},
}