000864659 001__ 864659
000864659 005__ 20210130002651.0
000864659 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.020
000864659 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0301-4797
000864659 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1095-8630
000864659 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:56826947
000864659 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:30861398
000864659 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000464296400041
000864659 037__ $$aFZJ-2019-04357
000864659 082__ $$a690
000864659 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)162255$$aErnst, Anna$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000864659 245__ $$aHow participation influences the perception of fairness, efficiency and effectiveness in environmental governance: An empirical analysis
000864659 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier$$c2019
000864659 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000864659 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000864659 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1568264664_1951
000864659 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000864659 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000864659 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000864659 520__ $$aParticipation processes can improve environmental decision-making. However, proving the impact of participation processes – i.e. decision-making involving diverse actors from civil society, business, state, and administration – is challenging. This paper therefore examines participation processes by applying proxy measures thatare assumed to strongly correlate with improved environmental decision-making. Such indicators include the perception of the process as being fair and legitimate, the final outcomes being considered effective and efficient, satisfaction with one's own engagement and the development of trust, and conflict resolution. Participationprocess characteristics such as participation format and facilitation are assumed to have an impact on these indicators. This study examined participation processes in relation to the German energy transformation (Energiewende), asking respondents about their experience of participation, their perception of the process, andalso about intermediate outcomes such as trust building and conflict resolution. An online survey was conducted, resulting in 516 valid responses. The results show that participation processes related to the Energiewende are often perceived as fair and legitimate. Moreover, the findings provide a better understanding of the relationshipsbetween participation process characteristics and desirable intermediate outcomes, such as trust and conflict resolution, as well as normative process factors. The intensity of a participation process – i.e. whether it is dialogic or a written consultation process – had no significant influence either on normative process factors, such as procedural fairness, or on trust or conflict resolution. Instead, a trustworthy moderator and the integration of all affected interests are important participation process characteristics that could determine the success of the decision-making process.
000864659 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153$$a153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)$$cPOF3-153$$fPOF III$$x0
000864659 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000864659 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1469206-5$$a10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.020$$gVol. 238, p. 368 - 381$$p368 - 381$$tJournal of environmental management$$v238$$x0301-4797$$y2019
000864659 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864659/files/Ernst%202019%20How%20participation%20influences%20the%20perception%20of%20fairness%2C%20efficiency.pdf$$yRestricted
000864659 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864659/files/Ernst%202019%20How%20participation%20influences%20the%20perception%20of%20fairness%2C%20efficiency.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000864659 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:864659$$pVDB
000864659 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)162255$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000864659 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-150$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bEnergie$$lTechnologie, Innovation und Gesellschaft$$vAssessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security$$x0
000864659 9141_ $$y2019
000864659 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000864659 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000864659 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000864659 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000864659 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bJ ENVIRON MANAGE : 2017
000864659 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000864659 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000864659 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000864659 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000864659 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000864659 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000864659 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000864659 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1040$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bZoological Record
000864659 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000864659 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000864659 920__ $$lyes
000864659 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013$$kIEK-STE$$lSystemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung$$x0
000864659 980__ $$ajournal
000864659 980__ $$aVDB
000864659 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
000864659 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED