001     864659
005     20210130002651.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.020
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0301-4797
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1095-8630
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a altmetric:56826947
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:30861398
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000464296400041
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2019-04357
082 _ _ |a 690
100 1 _ |a Ernst, Anna
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)162255
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a How participation influences the perception of fairness, efficiency and effectiveness in environmental governance: An empirical analysis
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2019
|b Elsevier
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1568264664_1951
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Participation processes can improve environmental decision-making. However, proving the impact of participation processes – i.e. decision-making involving diverse actors from civil society, business, state, and administration – is challenging. This paper therefore examines participation processes by applying proxy measures thatare assumed to strongly correlate with improved environmental decision-making. Such indicators include the perception of the process as being fair and legitimate, the final outcomes being considered effective and efficient, satisfaction with one's own engagement and the development of trust, and conflict resolution. Participationprocess characteristics such as participation format and facilitation are assumed to have an impact on these indicators. This study examined participation processes in relation to the German energy transformation (Energiewende), asking respondents about their experience of participation, their perception of the process, andalso about intermediate outcomes such as trust building and conflict resolution. An online survey was conducted, resulting in 516 valid responses. The results show that participation processes related to the Energiewende are often perceived as fair and legitimate. Moreover, the findings provide a better understanding of the relationshipsbetween participation process characteristics and desirable intermediate outcomes, such as trust and conflict resolution, as well as normative process factors. The intensity of a participation process – i.e. whether it is dialogic or a written consultation process – had no significant influence either on normative process factors, such as procedural fairness, or on trust or conflict resolution. Instead, a trustworthy moderator and the integration of all affected interests are important participation process characteristics that could determine the success of the decision-making process.
536 _ _ |a 153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153
|c POF3-153
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.020
|g Vol. 238, p. 368 - 381
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1469206-5
|p 368 - 381
|t Journal of environmental management
|v 238
|y 2019
|x 0301-4797
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864659/files/Ernst%202019%20How%20participation%20influences%20the%20perception%20of%20fairness%2C%20efficiency.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864659/files/Ernst%202019%20How%20participation%20influences%20the%20perception%20of%20fairness%2C%20efficiency.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:864659
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)162255
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Technologie, Innovation und Gesellschaft
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-150
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|v Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Energie
914 1 _ |y 2019
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J ENVIRON MANAGE : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1040
|2 StatID
|b Zoological Record
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
|k IEK-STE
|l Systemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21