% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Erdogan:864785,
      author       = {Erdogan, Meltem and Bau, Uwe and Bardow, André},
      title        = {{B}enchmarking commercial adsorbents for drying air in a
                      packed bed},
      journal      = {Applied thermal engineering},
      volume       = {160},
      issn         = {1359-4311},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2019-04442},
      pages        = {113942 -},
      year         = {2019},
      abstract     = {Adsorbents are widely used as desiccant materials to dry
                      air. The performance of an adsorbent strongly depends on the
                      fit of its properties to the process conditions, such as
                      humidity or temperature. Thus, it is crucial to characterize
                      adsorbents at the process conditions of the selected drying
                      application. For experimental characterization of
                      adsorbents, three indicators are selected that reflect
                      important objectives: (1) working capacity reflects the
                      necessary amount of adsorbent, (2) pressure drop across the
                      adsorbent bed reflects the necessary auxiliary energy for
                      ventilation and (3) dehumidification rate reflects the
                      process duration. In this paper, we evaluate 12 commercially
                      available adsorbents (SG 125, SG 127, SG 127H,
                      SG 125B, SG 127B, ProSorb, ArtSorb, SG E 
                      (2–4 mm), SG E  (3–6 mm), SG M, Zeolite 13X,
                      AQSOA Z02) for conditions derived from an adsorption
                      dishwasher application. Specifically, we employ an
                      adsorption temperature of , a desorption temperature of and
                      a relative humidity of . The results show that there is a
                      trade-off between dehumidification rate and pressure drop
                      across the bed with Pareto-optimal performance of SG M,
                      SG 127 and SG E  (3–6 mm). Furthermore, the
                      results show that there is a trade-off between
                      dehumidification rate and working capacity with
                      Pareto-optimal performance of SG 127B, SG E 
                      (3–6 mm) and AQSOA Z02. Thus, promising adsorbents for
                      drying air are identified.},
      cin          = {IEK-10},
      ddc          = {690},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-10-20170217},
      pnm          = {153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of
                      Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000484880800039},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113942},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864785},
}