% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Bau:864786,
      author       = {Bau, Uwe and Bardow, André},
      title        = {{P}areto-optimal performance of one-bed adsorption chillers
                      by easy-to-implement heat-flow-based control},
      journal      = {Applied thermal engineering},
      volume       = {159},
      issn         = {1359-4311},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2019-04443},
      pages        = {113590 -},
      year         = {2019},
      abstract     = {The control strategy strongly influences the performance of
                      adsorption chillers: both efficiency and cooling power
                      depend on phase times for adsorption and desorption. For a
                      given cooling power, operating points with maximum
                      efficiency are Pareto-optimal and desired in practice.
                      However, finding the corresponding phase times for
                      adsorption and desorption is difficult since these times
                      vary with system characteristics and inlet conditions. In
                      this paper, we mathematically derive a control strategy
                      which is based only on heat flow measurements in the
                      evaporator and the condenser of the adsorption chiller. The
                      derived control strategy finds the Pareto-optimal adsorption
                      and desorption phase times for a given cooling load. The
                      control strategy is easy to implement since it only requires
                      easily available temperature and volume flow measurements in
                      the secondary fluid circuits. The derived control strategy
                      is tested in (1) a simulation study and (2) an experimental
                      study. In the simulation study, we show that the control
                      strategy leads to (near) Pareto-optimal operation in cyclic
                      steady-state and quickly responses to step-changes in the
                      inlet conditions. In the experimental study, we demonstrate
                      the ease of implementation and we show optimal operation for
                      continuously varying inlet conditions.},
      cin          = {IEK-10},
      ddc          = {690},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-10-20170217},
      pnm          = {153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of
                      Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000475999100009},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.03.161},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864786},
}