guest ::
| Home > Publications database > FET PET reveals considerable spatial differences in tumour burden compared to conventional MRI in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. > print |
| Home > Publications database > FET PET reveals considerable spatial differences in tumour burden compared to conventional MRI in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. > print |
| 001 | 864916 | ||
| 005 | 20210130002750.0 | ||
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2019-04519 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Lohmann, Philipp |0 P:(DE-Juel1)145110 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |u fzj |
| 111 | 2 | _ | |a Germany |c Bremen |d 2019-04-03 - 2019-04-06 |w Bremen |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a FET PET reveals considerable spatial differences in tumour burden compared to conventional MRI in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. |
| 260 | _ | _ | |c 2019 |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Abstract |b abstract |m abstract |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)1 |s 1567756496_28189 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Conference Paper |0 33 |2 EndNote |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a INPROCEEDINGS |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a conferenceObject |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Conference Abstract |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a OTHER |2 ORCID |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a V54FET PET reveals considerable spatial differences in tumour burden compared to conventional MRI in newly diagnosed glioblastomaP. Lohmann1, P. Stavrinou2, K. Lipke1, E. K. Bauer3, G. Ceccon3, J. Werner3, B. Neumaier1, G. R. Fink3, N. J. Shah1, K. Langen1, N. Galldiks31Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Jülich; 2University of Cologne, Dept. of Neurosurgery, Cologne; 3University of Cologne, Dept. of Neurology, CologneZiel/Aim:Contrast enhancement (CE) in MRI is usually the target for resection or radiotherapy target volume definition in glioblastomas. However, the solid tumour mass may extend beyond areas of CE. Amino acid PET can detect such tumour parts that show no CE. We systematically investigated tumour volumes delineated by amino acid PET and MRI in newly diagnosed, untreated glioblastoma patients.Methodik/Methods:Preoperatively, 50 patients with neuropathologically confirmed glioblastoma underwent O-(2-[F-18]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and contrast-enhanced MRI. Areas of CE were manually segmented. FET PET tumour volumes were segmented using a tumour-to-brain ratio of 1.6. The percentage of overlapping volumes (OV), Dice and Jaccard spatial similarity coefficients (DSC; JSC) were calculated. FLAIR images were evaluated visually.Ergebnisse/Results:In 86% of patients (n = 43), the FET tumour volume was significantly larger than the volume of CE (21.5 ± 14.3 mL vs. 9.4 ± 11.3 mL; P < 0.001). Forty patients (80%) showed both an increased uptake of FET and CE. In these 40 patients, the spatial similarity between FET and CE was low (mean DSC, 0.39 ± 0.21; mean JSC, 0.26 ± 0.16). Ten patients (20%) showed no CE, and one of these patients showed no FET uptake. In 10% of patients (n = 5), increased FET uptake was present outside of areas of FLAIR hyperintensity.Schlussfolgerungen/Conclusions:Our data show that the metabolically active tumour volume delineated by FET PET is significantly larger than tumour volume delineated by CE. Furthermore, the data strongly suggest that the information derived from both imaging modalities should be integrated into the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572 |c POF3-572 |f POF III |x 0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Stavrinou, P. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Lipke, K. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Bauer, E. K. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Ceccon, G. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 4 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Werner, J. M. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 5 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Neumaier, B. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)166419 |b 6 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Fink, G. R. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131720 |b 7 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Shah, N. J. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131794 |b 8 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Langen, K. J. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131777 |b 9 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Galldiks, N. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)143792 |b 10 |u fzj |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://www.nuklearmedizin.de/jahrestagungen/abstr_online2019/abstract_detail.php?navId=227&aId=11 |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:864916 |p VDB |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 0 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)145110 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 6 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)166419 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 7 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)131720 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 8 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)131794 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 9 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)131777 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 10 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)143792 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Key Technologies |l Decoding the Human Brain |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500 |v (Dys-)function and Plasticity |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2019 |
| 920 | _ | _ | |l yes |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406 |k INM-3 |l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften |x 0 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406 |k INM-4 |l Physik der Medizinischen Bildgebung |x 1 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-5-20090406 |k INM-5 |l Nuklearchemie |x 2 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a abstract |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-5-20090406 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|