001     864925
005     20210130002757.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.05.013
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0168-1923
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1873-2240
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/22692
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000480376400016
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2019-04528
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Constantin, Julie
|0 0000-0001-9647-5374
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Management and spatial resolution effects on yield and water balance at regional scale in crop models
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2019
|b Elsevier
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1568015474_22204
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Due to the more frequent use of crop models at regional and national scale, the effects of spatial data input resolution have gained increased attention. However, little is known about the influence of variability in crop management on model outputs. A constant and uniform crop management is often considered over the simulated area and period. This study determines the influence of crop management adapted to climatic conditions and input data resolution on regional-scale outputs of crop models. For this purpose, winter wheat and maize were simulated over 30 years with spatially and temporally uniform management or adaptive management for North Rhine-Westphalia (˜34 083 km²), Germany. Adaptive management to local climatic conditions was used for 1) sowing date, 2) N fertilization dates, 3) N amounts, and 4) crop cycle length. Therefore, the models were applied with four different management sets for each crop. Input data for climate, soil and management were selected at five resolutions, from 1 × 1 km to 100 × 100 km grid size. Overall, 11 crop models were used to predict regional mean crop yield, actual evapotranspiration, and drainage. Adaptive management had little effect (<10% difference) on the 30-year mean of the three output variables for most models and did not depend on soil, climate, and management resolution. Nevertheless, the effect was substantial for certain models, up to 31% on yield, 27% on evapotranspiration, and 12% on drainage compared to the uniform management reference. In general, effects were stronger on yield than on evapotranspiration and drainage, which had little sensitivity to changes in management. Scaling effects were generally lower than management effects on yield and evapotranspiration as opposed to drainage. Despite this trend, sensitivity to management and scaling varied greatly among the models. At the annual scale, effects were stronger in certain years, particularly the management effect on yield. These results imply that depending on the model, the representation of management should be carefully chosen, particularly when simulating yields and for predictions on annual scale.
536 _ _ |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|c POF3-255
|f POF III
|x 0
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-BLE)2812-ERA-158
|x 1
|c 2812-ERA-158
|a MACSUR - Modelling European Agriculture with Climate Change for Food Security (2812-ERA-158)
|f FACCE MACSUR
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Raynal, Helene
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Casellas, Eric
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Hoffmann, Holger
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Bindi, Marco
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Doro, Luca
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Eckersten, Henrik
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Gaiser, Thomas
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Grosz, Balász
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Haas, Edwin
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Kersebaum, Kurt-Christian
|0 0000-0002-3679-8427
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Klatt, Steffen
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Kuhnert, Matthias
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Lewan, Elisabet
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 13
700 1 _ |a Maharjan, Ganga Ram
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 14
700 1 _ |a Moriondo, Marco
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 15
700 1 _ |a Nendel, Claas
|0 0000-0001-7608-9097
|b 16
700 1 _ |a Roggero, Pier Paolo
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 17
700 1 _ |a Specka, Xenia
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 18
700 1 _ |a Trombi, Giacomo
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 19
700 1 _ |a Villa, Ana
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 20
700 1 _ |a Wang, Enli
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 21
700 1 _ |a Weihermüller, Lutz
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129553
|b 22
700 1 _ |a Yeluripati, Jagadeesh
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 23
700 1 _ |a Zhao, Zhigan
|0 0000-0003-1533-7215
|b 24
700 1 _ |a Ewert, Frank
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 25
700 1 _ |a Bergez, Jacques-Eric
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 26
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.05.013
|g Vol. 275, p. 184 - 195
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2012165-9
|p 184 - 195
|t Agricultural and forest meteorology
|v 275
|y 2019
|x 0168-1923
856 4 _ |y Published on 2019-05-30. Available in OpenAccess from 2021-05-30.
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864925/files/Main_document.pdf
856 4 _ |y Published on 2019-05-30. Available in OpenAccess from 2021-05-30.
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/864925/files/Main_document.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:864925
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 22
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129553
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Erde und Umwelt
914 1 _ |y 2019
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a Embargoed OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b AGR FOREST METEOROL : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21