% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Abram:865048,
      author       = {Abram, Samantha V. and Hanke, Michael and Redish, A. David
                      and MacDonald, Angus W.},
      title        = {{N}eural signatures underlying deliberation in human
                      foraging decisions},
      journal      = {Cognitive, affective, $\&$ behavioral neuroscience},
      volume       = {19},
      number       = {6},
      issn         = {1530-7026},
      address      = {Austin, Tex.},
      publisher    = {Psychonomic Society Publication},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2019-04610},
      pages        = {1492-1508},
      year         = {2019},
      abstract     = {Humans have a remarkable capacity to mentally project
                      themselves far ahead in time. This ability, which entails
                      the mental simulation of events, is thought to be
                      fundamental to deliberative decision making, as it allows us
                      to search through and evaluatepossible choices. Many
                      decisions that humans make are foraging decisions, in which
                      one must decide whether an available offer is worth taking,
                      when compared to unknown future possibilities (i.e., the
                      background). Using a translational decision-makingparadigm
                      designed to reveal decision preferences in rats, we found
                      that humans engaged in deliberation when making foraging
                      decisions. A key feature of this task is that preferences
                      (and thus, value) are revealed as a function of serial
                      choices. Like rats,humans also took longer to respond when
                      faced with difficult decisions near their preference
                      boundary, which was associated with prefrontal and
                      hippocampal activation, exemplifying cross-species parallels
                      in deliberation. Furthermore, we found thatvoxels within the
                      visual cortices encoded neural representations of the
                      available possibilities specifically following
                      regretinducing experiences, in which the subject had
                      previously rejected a good offer only to encounter a
                      low-valued offer on thesubsequent trial.},
      cin          = {INM-7},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
      pnm          = {571 - Connectivity and Activity (POF3-571)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-571},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:31209734},
      UT           = {WOS:000511620000012},
      doi          = {10.3758/s13415-019-00733-z},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/865048},
}