% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Lohmann:865149,
author = {Lohmann, Philipp and Stavrinou, P. and Lipke, K. and Bauer,
E. K. and Ceccon, G. and Werner, J. and Fink, G. R. and
Shah, N. J. and Langen, K. J. and Galldiks, N.},
title = {{S}patial discrepancies between {FET} {PET} and
conventional {MRI} in patients with newly diagnosed
glioblastoma},
reportid = {FZJ-2019-04699},
year = {2019},
abstract = {P14.32 SPATIAL DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN FET PET AND
CONVENTIONAL MRI IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED
GLIOBLASTOMAP. Lohmann1, P. Stavrinou2, K. Lipke1, E. K.
Bauer3, G. Ceccon3, J. Werner3, G. R. Fink1,3, N. J.
Shah1,4, K. Langen1,5, N. Galldiks1,3; 1Institute of
Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3,-4), Research Center
Juelich, Juelich, Germany, 2Department of Neurosurgery,
Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne,
University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, 3Department of
Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital
Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany,
4Department of Neurology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen,
Aachen, Germany, 5Department of Nuclear Medicine, University
Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.BACKGROUND: In
patients with glioblastoma, the tissue showing contrast
enhancement (CE) in MRI is usually the target for resection
or radiotherapy. However, the solid tumor mass typically
extends beyond the area of CE. Amino acid PET can detect
tumor parts that show no CE. We systematically investigated
tumor volumes delineated by amino acid PET and MRI in newly
diagnosed, untreated glioblastoma patients. MATERIAL AND
METHODS: Preoperatively, 50 patients with subse-quently
neuropathologically confirmed glioblastoma underwent
O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET,
fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), and CE MRI.
Areas of CE were manually delineated. FET PET tumor volumes
were segmented using a tumor-to-brain ratio ≥ 1.6. The
per-centage of overlapping volumes (OV), as well as Dice and
Jaccard spatial similarity coefficients (DSC; JSC), were
calculated. FLAIR images were evalu-ated visually. RESULTS:
In $86\%$ of patients (n = 43), the FET PET tumor volume was
significantly larger than the volume of CE (21.5 ± 14.3 mL
vs. 9.4 ± 11.3 mL; P < 0.001). Forty patients $(80\%)$
showed both an increased uptake of FET and CE. In these 40
patients, the spatial similarity between FET and CE was low
(mean DSC, 0.39 ± 0.21; mean JSC, 0.26 ± 0.16). Ten
patients $(20\%)$ showed no CE, and one of these patients
showed no FET uptake. In $10\%$ of patients (n = 5),
increased FET uptake was present out-side of areas of FLAIR
hyperintensity. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the
metabolically active tumor volume delineated by FET PET is
signifi-cantly larger than tumor volume delineated by CE.
The data strongly suggest that the information derived from
FET PET should be integrated into the management of newly
diagnosed glioblastoma patients. FUNDING: This work was
supported by the Wilhelm-Sander Stiftung, Germany},
month = {Sep},
date = {2019-09-19},
organization = {14th Meeting of the European
Association of Neurooncology, Lyon
(Frankreich), 19 Sep 2019 - 22 Sep
2019},
subtyp = {Invited},
cin = {INM-3 / INM-4},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406},
pnm = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)6},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/865149},
}