% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@PHDTHESIS{Quade:865211,
author = {Quade, Maria},
title = {{P}artitioning {W}ater {V}apor {F}luxes by the {U}se of
{T}heir {W}ater {S}table {I}sotopologues: {F}rom the {L}ab
to the {F}ield},
volume = {469},
school = {Univ. Bonn},
type = {Dissertation},
address = {Jülich},
publisher = {Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Zentralbibliothek, Verlag},
reportid = {FZJ-2019-04745},
isbn = {978-3-95806-417-1},
series = {Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich Reihe Energie $\&$
Umwelt / Energy $\&$ Environment},
pages = {113},
year = {2019},
note = {Dissertation, Univ. Bonn, 2019},
abstract = {Water stable isotopes are powerful tracers for partitioning
of the terrestrial ecosystem water vapor fluxes into
process-based components, i.e. evapotranspiration (ET) into
soil evaporation (E) and plant transpiration (T). The
isotopic methodology for ET artitioning is based on the fact
that E and T have distinct water stable isotopic
compositions, which in turn are due to each flux being
differently affected by isotopic kinetic effects. To use
stable isotopologues of water in ET partitioning studies, a
good knowledge of the isotopic (equilibrium and kinetic)
fractionation effects is crucial. While the
temperature-dependent equilibrium fractionation factor is
well characterized (Majoube 1971), the kinetic fractionation
factor (αK), relevant, e.g., during soil evaporation, needs
further investigation. In order to address this knowledge
gap, we conducted a series of three different long-term bare
soil evaporation experiments (differing in soil-water
availability and aerodynamic conditions) to obtain αK
values from the collected isotopic data and the inversion of
a well-known resistance-totransfer model (i.e., the Craig
and Gordon (1965) model). The isotopic composition of the
soil water (δs) vapor was monitored non-destructively by
using gas-permeable tubing (Rothfuss et al. 2013).The Craig
and Gordon (1965) model was used in two different
approaches. The first approach uses the Keeling (1958) plot
to obtain values for the isotopic composition of the
evaporation (δE). The second approach uses the slope of the
linear regression between δs 2H and δs 18O. Results showed
that the largest source uncertainty in the computation of
αK stemmed from the uncertainty associated with the δE
values modeled with the Keeling (1958) plot method. In the
second approach αK values werewithin the theoretical range
proposed by Dongmann et al. (1974) and Mathieu and Bariac
(1996), which pointed to the prevalence of the turbulent
transport of water vapor under saturated and unsaturated
soil conditions.},
cin = {IBG-3},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255) / TERENO - Terrestrial Environmental
Observatories (TERENO-2008) / IDAS-GHG - Instrumental and
Data-driven Approaches to Source-Partitioning of Greenhouse
Gas Fluxes: Comparison, Combination, Advancement
(BMBF-01LN1313A)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 / G:(DE-HGF)TERENO-2008 /
G:(DE-Juel1)BMBF-01LN1313A},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)3 / PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
urn = {urn:nbn:de:0001-2019100920},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/865211},
}