000865378 001__ 865378
000865378 005__ 20210130003028.0
000865378 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3389/fnhum.2019.00190
000865378 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/23024
000865378 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:62236987
000865378 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:31263404
000865378 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000471593900001
000865378 037__ $$aFZJ-2019-04863
000865378 082__ $$a610
000865378 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aAlkhasli, Isabel$$b0
000865378 245__ $$aModulation of Fronto-Striatal Functional Connectivity Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
000865378 260__ $$aLausanne$$bFrontiers Research Foundation$$c2019
000865378 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000865378 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000865378 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1569574948_21918
000865378 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000865378 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000865378 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000865378 520__ $$aBackground: The fronto-striatal network is involved in various motor, cognitive, and emotional processes, such as spatial attention, working memory, decision-making, and emotion regulation. Intermittent theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTBS) has been shown to modulate functional connectivity of brain networks. Long stimulation intervals, as well as high stimulation intensities are typically applied in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) therapy for mood disorders. The role of stimulation intensity on network function and homeostasis has not been explored systematically yet.Objective: In this pilot study, we aimed to modulate fronto-striatal connectivity by applying iTBS at different intensities to the left dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). We measured individual and group changes by comparing resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) both pre-iTBS and post-iTBS. Differential effects of individual sub- vs. supra-resting motor-threshold stimulation intensities were assessed.Methods: Sixteen healthy subjects underwent excitatory iTBS at two intensities [90% and 120% of individual resting motor threshold (rMT)] on separate days. Six-hundred pulses (2 s trains, 8 s pauses, duration of 3 min, 20 s) were applied over the left DLPFC. Directly before and 7 min after stimulation, task-free rsfMRI sessions, lasting 10 min each, were conducted. Individual seed-to-seed functional connectivity changes were calculated for 10 fronto-striatal and amygdala regions of interest with the SPM toolbox DPABI.Results: Sub-threshold-iTBS increased functional connectivity directly between the left DLPFC and the left and right caudate, respectively. Supra-threshold stimulation did not change fronto-striatal functional connectivity but increased functional connectivity between the right amygdala and the right caudate.Conclusion: A short iTBS protocol applied at sub-threshold intensities was not only sufficient, but favorable, in order to increase bilateral fronto-striatal functional connectivity, while minimizing side effects. The absence of an increase in functional connectivity after supra-threshold stimulation was possibly caused by network homeostatic effects.
000865378 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573$$a573 - Neuroimaging (POF3-573)$$cPOF3-573$$fPOF III$$x0
000865378 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000865378 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSakreida, Katrin$$b1
000865378 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)132318$$aMottaghy, Felix M.$$b2$$ufzj
000865378 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)142495$$aBinkofski, Ferdinand$$b3$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000865378 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2425477-0$$a10.3389/fnhum.2019.00190$$gVol. 13, p. 190$$p190$$tFrontiers in human neuroscience$$v13$$x1662-5161$$y2019
000865378 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/865378/files/fnhum-13-00190.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000865378 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/865378/files/fnhum-13-00190.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000865378 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:865378$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000865378 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)132318$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000865378 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)142495$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000865378 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$vNeuroimaging$$x0
000865378 9141_ $$y2019
000865378 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000865378 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000865378 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000865378 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bFRONT HUM NEUROSCI : 2017
000865378 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal
000865378 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000865378 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000865378 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000865378 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000865378 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000865378 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review
000865378 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000865378 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000865378 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0320$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bPubMed Central
000865378 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000865378 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406$$kINM-4$$lPhysik der Medizinischen Bildgebung$$x0
000865378 9201_ $$0I:(DE-82)080010_20140620$$kJARA-BRAIN$$lJARA-BRAIN$$x1
000865378 980__ $$ajournal
000865378 980__ $$aVDB
000865378 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000865378 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406
000865378 980__ $$aI:(DE-82)080010_20140620
000865378 9801_ $$aFullTexts