% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Zhou:866064,
      author       = {Zhou, Dapeng and Mack, Daniel Emil and Bakan, Emine and
                      Mauer, Georg and Sebold, Doris and Guillon, Olivier and
                      Vaßen, Robert},
      title        = {{T}hermal {C}ycling {P}erformances of {M}ultilayered
                      {Y}ttria {S}tabilized {Z}irconia/{G}adolinium {Z}irconate
                      {T}hermal {B}arrier {C}oatings},
      journal      = {Journal of the American Ceramic Society},
      volume       = {103},
      number       = {3},
      issn         = {1551-2916},
      address      = {Westerville, Ohio},
      publisher    = {Soc.},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2019-05304},
      pages        = {2048-2061},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Gadolinium zirconate (Gd2Zr2O7, GZO) as an advanced thermal
                      barrier coating (TBC) material, has lower thermal
                      conductivity, better phase stability, sintering resistance,
                      and calcium‐magnesium‐alumino‐silicates (CMAS) attack
                      resistance than yttria‐stabilized zirconia (YSZ, 6‐8
                      $wt\%)$ at temperatures above 1200°C. However, the
                      drawbacks of GZO, such as the low fracture toughness and the
                      formation of deleterious interphases with thermally grown
                      alumina have to be considered for the application as TBC.
                      Using atmospheric plasma spraying (APS) and suspension
                      plasma spraying (SPS), double‐layered YSZ/GZO TBCs, and
                      triple‐layered YSZ/GZO TBCs were manufactured. In thermal
                      cycling tests, both multilayered TBCs showed a significant
                      longer lifetime than conventional single‐layered APS YSZ
                      TBCs. The failure mechanism of TBCs in thermal cycling test
                      was investigated. In addition, the CMAS attack resistance of
                      both TBCs was also investigated in a modified burner rig
                      facility. The triple‐layered TBCs had an extremely long
                      lifetime under CMAS attack. The failure mechanism of TBCs
                      under CMAS attack and the CMAS infiltration mechanism were
                      investigated and discussed.},
      cin          = {IEK-1 / JARA-ENERGY},
      ddc          = {660},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-1-20101013 / $I:(DE-82)080011_20140620$},
      pnm          = {113 - Methods and Concepts for Material Development
                      (POF3-113)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-113},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000506691600053},
      doi          = {10.1111/jace.16862},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/866064},
}