000866425 001__ 866425
000866425 005__ 20220930130222.0
000866425 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3389/fpls.2019.01358
000866425 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/23441
000866425 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:70519414
000866425 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:31736998
000866425 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000497684100001
000866425 037__ $$aFZJ-2019-05572
000866425 082__ $$a570
000866425 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$ade Moraes, Moacir Tuzzin$$b0
000866425 245__ $$aMechanical and Hydric Stress Effects on Maize Root System Development at Different Soil Compaction Levels
000866425 260__ $$aLausanne$$bFrontiers Media$$c2019
000866425 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000866425 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000866425 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1574349230_12583
000866425 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000866425 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000866425 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000866425 520__ $$aSoil mechanical resistance, aeration, and water availability directly affect plant root growth. The objective of this work was to identify the contribution of mechanical and hydric stresses on maize root elongation, by modeling root growth while taking the dynamics of these stresses in an Oxisol into consideration. The maize crop was cultivated under four compaction levels (soil chiseling, no-tillage system, areas trafficked by a tractor, and trafficked by a harvester), and we present a new model, which allows to distinguish between mechanical and hydric stresses. Root length density profiles, soil bulk density, and soil water retention curves were determined for four compaction levels up to 50 cm in depth. Furthermore, grain yield and shoot biomass of maize were quantified. The new model described the mechanical and hydric stresses during maize growth with field data for the first time in maize crop. Simulations of root length density in 1D and 2D showed adequate agreement with the values measured under field conditions. Simulation makes it possible to identify the interaction between the soil physical conditions and maize root growth. Compared to the no-tillage system, grain yield was reduced due to compaction caused by harvester traffic and by soil chiseling. The root growth was reduced by the occurrence of mechanical and hydric stresses during the crop cycle, the principal stresses were mechanical in origin for areas with agricultural traffic, and water based in areas with soil chiseling. Including mechanical and hydric stresses in root growth models can help to predict future scenarios, and coupling soil biophysical models with weather, soil, and crop responses will help to improve agricultural management.
000866425 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000866425 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000866425 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDebiasi, Henrique$$b1
000866425 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aFranchini, Julio Cezar$$b2
000866425 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBonetti, João de Andrade$$b3
000866425 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLevien, Renato$$b4
000866425 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)157922$$aSchnepf, Andrea$$b5$$eCorresponding author
000866425 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLeitner, Daniel$$b6
000866425 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2613694-6$$a10.3389/fpls.2019.01358$$gVol. 10, p. 1358$$p1358$$tFrontiers in plant science$$v10$$x1664-462X$$y2019
000866425 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/866425/files/2018-0165087-7.pdf
000866425 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/866425/files/2018-0165087-7.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa
000866425 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/866425/files/fpls-10-01358.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000866425 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/866425/files/fpls-10-01358.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000866425 8767_ $$82018-0165087-7$$92019-10-02$$d2019-11-14$$eAPC$$jDeposit$$lDeposit: Frontiers$$p444165$$z1799.03 USD
000866425 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:866425$$popenCost$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pdriver$$pOpenAPC$$popen_access$$popenaire$$pdnbdelivery
000866425 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)157922$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b5$$kFZJ
000866425 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000866425 9141_ $$y2019
000866425 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000866425 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000866425 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000866425 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bFRONT PLANT SCI : 2017
000866425 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal
000866425 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000866425 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000866425 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000866425 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000866425 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000866425 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review
000866425 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000866425 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000866425 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000866425 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0320$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bPubMed Central
000866425 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000866425 920__ $$lyes
000866425 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000866425 980__ $$ajournal
000866425 980__ $$aVDB
000866425 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000866425 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000866425 980__ $$aAPC
000866425 9801_ $$aAPC
000866425 9801_ $$aFullTexts