001     866556
005     20210130003524.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.algal.2019.101634
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/23426
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:66824813
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a WOS:000489307800033
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2019-05646
082 _ _ |a 580
100 1 _ |a Siebers, Nina
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)164361
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Towards phosphorus recycling for agriculture by algae: Soil incubation and rhizotron studies using 33P-labeled microalgal biomass
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2019
|b Elsevier
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1579500332_29416
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Algae effectively accumulate phosphorus (P) from the environment, qualifying them as a promising novel P fertilizer. We hypothesized that P in algae can be rapidly transformed in soil and mobilized for plant growth. To determine the fate of algal fertilizer in soil and to trace its efficiency for plant uptake, we labeled the algae Chlorella vulgaris with the radioisotope 33P. To optimize the labeling we studied P-uptake dynamics in detail using a pre-starved culture and additionally monitored polyphosphate (Poly-P) and organic carbon (C) reserve pools by Raman microscopy. Using an optimized labeling procedure, the concentrations and distribution of both algae-derived 33P and mineral fertilizer 33P (control) were characterized in incubation and rhizotron experiments. Soil incubation was performed with four major reference groups (Andosol, Alisol, Cambisol, and Vertisol). To assess 33P plant uptake we grew wheat in rhizotrons on Cambisol. Soil analyses at different incubation times demonstrated sequential 33P fractionation, while plant uptake of algae-derived 33P was followed using sequential autoradiographic imaging. We found that the algae increased labile P pools comprising Resin- and NaHCO3-extractable P in soils during the first 2 weeks of incubation, similar to the effects of NPK fertilizer. The soils with elevated concentrations of Fe- and Al-oxides (Andosol and Alisol) immediately bound 55 to 80% of the applied fertilizer 33P into the moderately available NaOH-P fraction, whereas the soils with lower concentrations of Fe/Al-oxides (Cambisol, Vertisol) stored 35–71% of the algal-P in the labile fraction. The rhizotron experiments visually supported the release and plant-uptake of algal 33P, thus verifying the suitability of algal-fertilizer for plant growth.
536 _ _ |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|c POF3-255
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Hofmann, Diana
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129471
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Schiedung, Henning
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)165137
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Landsrath, Alexander
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Ackermann, Bärbel
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)168528
|b 4
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Gao, Lu
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)173963
|b 5
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Mojzeš, Peter
|0 0000-0002-9952-6939
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Jablonowski, Nicolai D.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129475
|b 7
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Nedbal, Ladislav
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)159592
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Amelung, Wulf
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129427
|b 9
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.algal.2019.101634
|g Vol. 43, p. 101634 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2655780-0
|p 101634 -
|t Algal Research
|v 43
|y 2019
|x 2211-9264
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/866556/files/Siebers%20et%20al_accepted.pdf
|y Published on 2019-08-14. Available in OpenAccess from 2021-08-14.
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/866556/files/Siebers%20et%20al_accepted.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y Published on 2019-08-14. Available in OpenAccess from 2021-08-14.
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:866556
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)164361
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129471
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)168528
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)173963
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129475
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)159592
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 9
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129427
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Erde und Umwelt
914 1 _ |y 2019
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a Embargoed OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b ALGAL RES : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 1
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21