% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Munns:866582,
      author       = {Munns, Rana and Day, David A. and Fricke, Wieland and Watt,
                      Michelle and Arsova, Borjana and Barkla, Bronwyn J. and
                      Bose, Jayakumar and Byrt, Caitlin S. and Chen, Zhong‐Hua
                      and Foster, Kylie J. and Gilliham, Matthew and Henderson,
                      Sam W. and Jenkins, Colin L. D. and Kronzucker, Herbert J.
                      and Miklavcic, Stanley J. and Plett, Darren and Roy, Stuart
                      J. and Shabala, Sergey and Shelden, Megan C. and Soole,
                      Kathleen L. and Taylor, Nicolas L. and Tester, Mark and
                      Wege, Stefanie and Wegner, Lars H. and Tyerman, Stephen D.},
      title        = {{E}nergy costs of salt tolerance in crop plants},
      journal      = {The new phytologist},
      volume       = {225},
      number       = {3},
      issn         = {1469-8137},
      address      = {Oxford [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Wiley-Blackwell},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2019-05665},
      pages        = {1072-1090},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Agriculture is expanding into regions that are affected by
                      salinity. This review considers the energetic costs of
                      salinity tolerance in crop plants and provides a framework
                      for a quantitative assessment of costs. Different sources of
                      energy, and modifications of root system architecture that
                      would maximize water vs ion uptake are addressed. Energy
                      requirements for transport of salt (NaCl) to leaf vacuoles
                      for osmotic adjustment could be small if there are no
                      substantial leaks back across plasma membrane and tonoplast
                      in root and leaf. The coupling ratio of the H+‐ATPase also
                      is a critical component. One proposed leak, that of Na+
                      influx across the plasma membrane through certain aquaporin
                      channels, might be coupled to water flow, thus conserving
                      energy. For the tonoplast, control of two types of cation
                      channels is required for energy efficiency. Transporters
                      controlling the Na+ and Cl− concentrations in mitochondria
                      and chloroplasts are largely unknown and could be a major
                      energy cost. The complexity of the system will require a
                      sophisticated modelling approach to identify critical
                      transporters, apoplastic barriers and root structures. This
                      modelling approach will inform experimentation and allow a
                      quantitative assessment of the energy costs of NaCl
                      tolerance to guide breeding and engineering of molecular
                      components.},
      cin          = {IBG-2},
      ddc          = {580},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
      pnm          = {582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:31004496},
      UT           = {WOS:000477247700001},
      doi          = {10.1111/nph.15864},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/866582},
}